India: An Emerging Economic Powerhouse and the Need for In-House Counsel
With sustained economic growth above 7 percent and an exploding start-up culture, the Indian economy is booming. And thanks to the ongoing economic liberalization brought about by the Modi government, it's never been more accessible for foreign companies.
May 14, 2018 at 11:47 AM
4 minute read
With sustained economic growth above 7 percent and an exploding start-up culture, the Indian economy is booming. And thanks to the ongoing economic liberalization brought about by the Modi government, it's never been more accessible for foreign companies. But challenges remain for international corporations looking to establish or expand their presence on the subcontinent. Hiring the proper in-house counsel can be the difference between steering through the complexities of the Indian legal landscape and getting caught up in them.
|The Necessary Legal Leadership
In some more traditional business contexts, in-house lawyers play a support role, often isolated from other departments. In Indian companies today, the general counsel is a central part of the leadership, often touching every area of a business. For many multinational corporations (MNCs) operating in India, the general counsel is their first legal hire. GCs often take on a wide range of responsibilities, including business contract management, litigation, board advising, crisis management, ethics and compliance.
The range of growth industries in India attracting lawyers and MNCs continues to widen. The country is becoming a hub of research and development, increasing the need for lawyers specializing in intellectual property rights. The health care, pharmaceuticals, and life sciences industries in particular are seeking more and more legal talent.
India's complex laws and regulations can be sources of both frustration and opportunity for every sector and in every area of a business. Beyond just knowledge, skilled GCs are especially important for MNCs entering or expanding in India; they can be the difference between a reactive company culture and a proactive one.
|Hiring the Right Candidates
Keeping this cultural role in mind is an essential part of hiring successful candidates for both general counsel and in-house legal staff at lower levels. Understandably, many MNCs look to hire Indian attorneys, given that successfully navigating the Indian legal landscape requires significant experience in India. Foreign-qualified candidates are not as sought-after, though lawyers with experience working in a foreign company or studying or working abroad are highly valued.
However, MNCs are often unaware of the training and experience differences in the development of Indian lawyers. While Indian lawyers often have excellent work experience, they are trained with a focus on gaining technical and operational skills rather than developing soft skills more often found in U.S. attorneys. This means that MNCs entering India often have to redefine the connection between experience level and salary. For example, companies recruiting for a position in the United States or Europe might require a lawyer with five years' experience, but the mix of soft and hard skills they assume comes with that level of experience doesn't exist in the same way in India. Companies hiring for the same position in India would have to look at more senior candidates, leading to higher salary costs.
MNCs in India also commonly seek lawyers who have experience working in a matrix organizational structure, and place a particular focus on female lawyers across all industries to boost in-house diversity.
|Retaining Talent
For Indian companies, keeping talented corporate counsel from looking elsewhere means incentives such as bonuses and benefits as well as providing clear career development paths. MNCs can leverage their global reach to attract top Indian legal talent. Candidates in India appreciate the significance of the Indian market, but often wish to broaden their experience, especially in roles with exposure to Southeast Asian or Middle Eastern markets. As a result, positions with the option for internal temporary transfers to jurisdictions outside India are highly desired.
Companies in India have come to recognize the significance of the in-house counsel role and the value it adds to their operations. As the economy continues to evolve, the demand for more highly qualified legal talent will increase and multinational corporations will need to go the extra mile to retain talent.
|Making It in India
There is tremendous opportunity for corporations eyeing India as a next move. But the cultural, economic, and legal differences between India and many Western countries necessitate serious consideration of how businesses must adapt to make it work. Hiring the right in-house counsel to navigate the new territory is essential, and MNCs must take that responsibility seriously in order to prosper.
Pooja Mahbubani is a consultant in Major, Lindsey & Africa's Hong Kong office, where she executes midlevel to general counsel retained search assignments for a diverse client base throughout India and South Asia.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250