Legal Artificial Intelligence Vendors On the Rise, Report Says
Options abound for legal departments attempting to integrate more artificial intelligence into their work.
May 14, 2018 at 04:41 PM
3 minute read
There has been a boom in the number of vendors who sell artificial intelligence products to legal departments—making for a more competitive market and increasing vendor options for in-house counsel, according to a buyer's guide for legal technology published by LawGeex on Monday.
“The In-House Counsel's Legal Tech Buyer's Guide 2018″ shows there has been a 60 percent increase in AI vendors since 2017. Last year, the LawGeex buyer's guide counted 40 vendors creating AI for in-house legal departments; and this year the number has risen to 66.
The rise in vendors appears to have gone up along with the need for AI in the in-house market. According to the guide, 71 percent of law departments indicated that they need an increase in productivity but need it without hiring additional (human) workers.
“Any legal tech that saves an attorney time through increased efficiency is inherently valuable and attorneys—more than almost any profession—know the value of time,” Roberto Facundus, senior vice president of legal and business affairs at Tongal Inc., said in the guide.
Shmuli Goldberg, the vice president of marketing at LawGeex, told Corporate Counsel that more in-house counsel are starting to trust AI technologies.
He said legal departments are continually being asked to do more with less. AI, he said, allows lawyers to do less grunt work and focus on more important tasks. Goldberg said that while there is still some hesitation to use AI, many in-house teams have adopted it with the understanding that it will not replace attorneys, which was a fear when the technology was first introduced.
“It's not going to make decisions on behalf of the legal team,” Goldberg said, comparing AI tools to auto-pilot technology. “No auto-pilot is ever going to replace the pilot.”
Goldberg said that he does not believe that the growing market for AI will make the technology more affordable. However, he did say it means existing vendors in this space will have to step up their game.
“The market will become competitive. It's going to eventually lead to better product and services in the market,” Goldberg said.
AI is being used for nearly everything from drafting legal documents to dealing with intellectual property. There are numerous vendors working on providing solutions around many of these tasks, according to the guide, but there are more AI vendors for e-discovery and legal research than anything else.
The guide recommends that those interested in buying legal technology in general first prioritize what they need in their departments, then establish what they already have. Then, it said, they should define the goals and requirements of what they need from their legal tech, pick the solution and then plan for what can go wrong and for “disappointments along the way.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250