SEC Cutting Back on Corporate Enforcement Actions, Report Says
The enforcement decline is part of a downward trend that began in the last half of fiscal year 2017.
May 15, 2018 at 05:27 PM
3 minute read
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission building in Washington, D.C.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed only 15 new enforcement actions against public companies and their subsidiaries in the first half of fiscal year 2018—the lowest semiannual in five years, new figures show.
The trend was part of a report, “SEC Enforcement Activity: Public Companies and Subsidiaries—Midyear FY 2018 Update,” released Tuesday by the Pollack Center for Law & Business at New York University and by Cornerstone Research. The 15 enforcement actions compares with 45 in the same period a year ago.
The enforcement decline is part of a downward trend that began in the last half of fiscal year 2017 and has continued through the first half of 2018. [The SEC's fiscal half year began on Oct. 1 and ended on March 31.]
New York University School of Law professor Stephen Choi, director of the Pollack Center and co-author of the report, told Corporate Counsel that if the 2017 decline were due to lingering transition issues after President Donald Trump took office, “as time goes by we would begin to see an uptick. But that's not what we're seeing. This trend in lower enforcement is continuing.”
Stephen Choi. Courtesy photo.
The trend suggests that the SEC is not pursuing companies as aggressively as it had under prior administrations. “It could just be less fraud in the economy, but that isn't likely,” Choi said.
Choi said he also noticed that the range of industries that the SEC brought actions against has narrowed somewhat. The percentage of overall actions brought against companies in the category that includes finance, insurance and real estate rose to 67 percent—the highest percentage since Cornerstone began keeping track in 2010.
In contrast, the services industry had zero enforcement actions for the first time. “There are a lot of big companies in the services industry,” Choi said. “So it could be a temporary blip.”
He said enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act seems to escape the downward trend. FCPA enforcements had declined during the first eight months of the Trump administration, but have since jumped, he said.
He pointed to two FCPA enforcements in the first half of 2018, compared with none in the first half of 2017. “And in April, after the time period of this report, there [were] two more FCPA actions,” Choi said. “So it [enforcement decline] is not an overall phenomenon.”
The report also noted that monetary settlements in the first half of the year decreased substantially from prior fiscal years. The average monetary settlement so far in 2018 was $4.3 million, it said, significantly below the next-lowest semiannual average of $13.3 million, which occurred in the second half of 2015.
And the maximum monetary settlement of $14 million was by far the lowest maximum monetary settlement in any half-year in the database.
In other areas, the report showed:
- There were 12 individual defendants involved in the actions; nine of them held positions as CEO, CFO or controller.
- Actions concerning issuer reporting and disclosure, or investment adviser/investment companies were the most common types.
- More than half of public company and subsidiary defendants cooperated in this time period, compared to less than a third in the second half of 2017.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHarris' Promised Ban on Food Price Gouging Could Be Difficult to Implement, Antitrust Experts Say
3 minute readFacebook, Nvidia Make High Court Case Against Investor Suits
Kroger Suit Claims FTC Using Unconstitutional Process to Try to Kill Megamerger
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250