Uber CLO Explains Decision to Scrap Mandatory Arbitration Clauses and NDAs Around Sexual Harassment, Assault
Tony West of Uber explained the rationale behind his company's announcement of new policies on how it deals with claims of sexual harassment and assault.
May 15, 2018 at 06:01 AM
5 minute read
Uber Technologies Inc. is taking steps to make it easier for survivors of sexual harassment and assault to come forward and make their voices heard.
The San Francisco-based ride-hailing company announced Tuesday morning it would eliminate the requirement of arbitration clauses for any employee, driver or rider who says they have experienced sexual harassment or assault. And it will not require any survivors to sign on to nondisclosure agreements if they wish to speak out about their claims.
“As we look at ways to improve the safety of the Uber platform, you really can't do everything to enhance the safety without dealing with sexual harassment and assault,” Uber chief legal officer Tony West said in an interview with Corporate Counsel before the announcement.
“What's important to us is making sure we're helping to facilitate victims to choose the venue of redress where they will seek some sort of justice whether through mediation, arbitration or open court,” he explained.
The announcement comes about two weeks after a CNN investigation revealed more than 100 Uber drivers have been accused of sexually assaulting or abusing passengers in the last four years.
The recent CNN piece prompted Sen. Richard Blumenthal to put pressure on Uber to end the practice of arbitration clauses.
“Claims subject to forced arbitration are relegated to private forums where powerful defendants can stack the deck against claimants and cover up wrongdoing,” Blumenthal wrote in a May 2 letter to Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi.
Abuse by drivers is a known issue for Uber, and a class action was filed last year that alleged widespread sexual assault by drivers and demanded change from the company.
In response to Tuesday morning's announcement, Jeanne Christensen, a partner at Wigdor LLP, the firm that brought the class action, congratulated Uber in a statement for “choosing not to silence survivors.”
“Our hope is that Uber ending forced arbitration for victims of sexual assault will begin a process to reduce future suffering by women passengers,” the statement said. Christensen added that despite this “critical step,” she believes Uber still needs to remove barriers to survivors proceeding together as a class to bring claims.
In his interview with Corporate Counsel, West explained that since joining the company in late November, he and Khosrowshahi have been working to find ways “to do the right thing.”
One way it has decided to separate the company from any questionable behavior is to address the issue of sexual harassment.
“This is not a response to that [the CNN report],” West said. “These conversations started long before that—from the Susan Fowler blog post, to the #MeToo movement, to the context we are living in. In raising these issues, and rightfully so, we want to have the ability to have this conversation in a meaningful way with external shareholders.”
West addressed the fact that some may argue the removal of arbitration clauses “doesn't go far enough.” He anticipates that some individuals want the removal of arbitration clauses to extend to matters of gender or race discrimination. He said those are avenues the company will explore further, but the focus right now is on sexual harassment and assault.
“That's both because of the safety component, as well as the fact that we have heard repeatedly that the most important thing is to give individual survivors the forum they choose to press forward with individual claims and options to tell their story if that's what they choose to do,” he said.
In addition to removing the arbitration clause for survivors, Uber will give them the chance to settle their claims with the company without any NDA or confidentiality provision that restricts how they speak about the incidents.
“We think it's important for that decision to rest with survivors,” West said, adding that Uber “will not stand in the way” of how survivors decide to tell their stories.
The third piece of Uber's strategy to curb sexual abuse is its commitment to publish a transparency report, using data it collects from reports of sexual harassment or assault on the company's platform.
“No company or transportation agency has done that before,” West said.
He is hopeful that the reporting will lead to other companies doing the same. West said that Uber has had conversations with dozens of women's groups to discuss what Uber and other businesses can do to reduce the number of assaults.
Uber has also hired advisers from the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence, the National Network to End Domestic Violence and the Time's Up Legal Defense Fund, according to a company blog post published by West early Tuesday.
At least on the mandatory arbitration front, Uber is not the first company to shift its policies in the wake of the #MeToo movement. Fellow tech company Microsoft Corp. announced last December that it would do away with mandatory arbitration for those employees who claim they've experienced sexual harassment.
This story has been updated to include comment from Wigdor LLP.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250