Acting AG Underwood Announces Intent to Sue Purdue Pharma Over Opioids
The statement of intent to sue the Stamford, Connecticut-based maker of OxyContin comes after a September 2017 announcement by a bipartisan coalition of 41 state attorneys general of an investigation into the role of major pharmaceutical companies in the current opioid epidemic.
May 17, 2018 at 03:09 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Purdue Pharma's OxyContin pills. (AP Photo/Toby Talbot, File)
Acting New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood and Gov. Andrew Cuomo have announced the state intends to file a lawsuit against Purdue Pharma over its marketing of opioid pain medication.
The statement of intent to sue the Stamford, Connecticut-based maker of OxyContin comes after a September 2017 announcement by a bipartisan coalition of 41 state attorneys general of an investigation into the role of major pharmaceutical companies in the current opioid epidemic.
“After a lengthy investigation, we are preparing a lawsuit against Purdue Pharma for its alleged deception and reckless disregard for the health and well-being of New Yorkers. It is clear to us that Purdue profited by deliberately exploiting New Yorkers' addictions, and by pushing health care providers to increase patients' use and dependence on these potentially fatal drugs,” Underwood said in a statement released on Wednesday.
“In addition to our impending lawsuit against Purdue, our office will continue to lead the multi-state investigation of opioid manufacturers and distributors across the country,” she said.
In response, a spokesman for Purdue Pharma said in an emailed statement Thursday: “We are disappointed that after months of good faith negotiations working toward a meaningful resolution to help the state of New York address the opioid crisis, the attorney general has unilaterally decided to pursue a costly and protracted litigation process. We vigorously deny these allegations and look forward to the opportunity to present our defense.”
The spokesman also pointed out that the privately held company stopped promoting opioid medications to prescribers in February.
At least six other states besides New York also are saying they intend to sue Purdue Pharma in connection with the opioid abuse epidemic. Florida already filed a complaint in state court on May 15 against Purdue and four other opioid makers as well as three drug distributors.
The Florida complaint alleged that the drug companies made misrepresentations about the addictiveness of their medications in order to increase prescribing and patient use despite the risks. The complaint further alleged that the manufacturers funded front organizations to tout the drugs and paid medical experts who were presented as neutral to endorse the painkillers while downplaying the risk of addiction. The lawsuit seeks damages and restitution plus attorney fees and legal costs as well as injunctive relief under the Florida RICO Act and state Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
John Parker, senior VP of the Healthcare Distribution Alliance, a trade group, said in a statement that, “given our role, the idea that distributors are responsible for the number of opioid prescriptions written defies common sense and lacks understanding of how the pharmaceutical supply chain actually works and is regulated. Those bringing lawsuits would be better served addressing the root causes, rather than trying to redirect blame through litigation.”
The attorneys general of Nevada, Texas, North Carolina, North Dakota and Tennessee similarly are accusing Purdue Pharma of violating state consumer protection laws. Sixteen other states and Puerto Rico already have sued Purdue, and California and Massachusetts also have announced intent to sue, according to Reuters news agency.
Mounting state litigation against drugmakers comes as numerous counties and municipal governments across the United States—including more than half the counties in New York state —already have filed lawsuits in county, state and federal courts blaming opioid manufacturers for the U.S. epidemic of prescription painkiller and heroin abuse, often assisted by plaintiff firms such as Simmons Hanly Conroy, leading some to compare the litigation to Big Tobacco.
In 2015, then-New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced that New York had reached a settlement with Purdue requiring the company to change its marketing practices around oxycodone, the generic name for brand name extended-release formula OxyContin, following an investigation opened in 2013. Between the 1990s and 2011, oxycodone prescriptions more than doubled in the United States and sales of oxycodone increased more than tenfold, the AG's Office said at the time, and 10 percent of oxycodone prescriptions in the state were for OxyContin.
In the United States, 63,632 drug overdose deaths occurred in 2016, the last year for which figures are available. Opioids were involved in more than 66 percent of drug overdose deaths, according to data released in March by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManafort Found Guilty of Bank, Tax Fraud in First Trial Win for Mueller
6 minute readCisco, Arista Settle IP, Antitrust Disputes With Arista Paying $400M
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250