In Former Engineer's Harassment Suit, Uber's Decision to Scrap Arbitration Gets Its First Test
The lawsuit comes just a week after the company announced that it would forgo arbitration and nondisclosure agreements in harassment cases.
May 21, 2018 at 06:19 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
In the first test of Uber's newly announced policy to let sexual harassment and assault cases play out in public, a former Latina engineer sued the company claiming she faced discrimination based on her gender, ethnicity and disability.
Lawyers at Outten & Golden on Monday filed suit in San Francisco Superior Court on behalf of former Uber software engineer Ingrid Avendaño, who worked for the company from February 2014 to June 2017.
“Over her entire tenure at Uber, Avendaño saw and experienced a male-dominated work culture, permeated with degrading, marginalizing, discriminatory, and sexually harassing conduct towards women,” wrote Outten & Golden's Jennifer Schwartz and Menaka Fernando in Monday's 33-page complaint.
Avendaño claims she was hired at $100,000, a comparatively low salary compared with her male and white colleagues, and that she was promoted slower than similar-performing colleagues. She also claims that shortly after she started, she complained about inappropriate and discriminatory behavior by a male colleague at a recruiting event, but the complaint was ignored. The same employee later spread rumors that she had slept her way into the company, she claims.
Avendaño also claims that discriminatory behavior contributed to her physical and emotional problems, including panic attacks that she says proceeded to the point that she was vomiting at work.
“[E]ach time Avendaño raised concerns regarding unlawful conduct, she was met with Uber's entrenched disregard for the rights of its women employees and a refusal to take effective steps to prevent harassment,” her lawyers wrote. “Worse, she suffered blatant retaliation, including denial of promotions and raises, unwarranted negative performance reviews, and placement on an oppressively demanding on-call schedule that had detrimental effects on her health.”
Avendaño was among the initially named plaintiffs in a pay discrimination lawsuit against Uber, which the company ultimately settled for $10 million with a class of 420 minority and women engineers in March. According a press release announcing the lawsuit, Avendaño did not participate in the previously announced settlement.
In response to a request for comment on the lawsuit, an Uber spokeswoman said the company was “moving in a new direction.”
“Last week, we proactively announced changes to our arbitration policies,” she said. “And in the past year we have implemented a new salary and equity structure based on the market, overhauled our performance review process, published Diversity & Inclusion reports, and created and delivered diversity and leadership trainings to thousands of employees globally.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Supreme Court Rejects Case Challenging Google's Trademark as Generic
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
- 2States Reach New $7.4B Opioid Deal With Purdue After SCOTUS Ruling
- 3$975,000 Settlement Reached After Fall on Sidewalk
- 4'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
- 5Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250