JetBlue GC Retires, Flies Off Into the Sunset With $1.2M
James Hnat revealed last week that he will leave JetBlue. But he won't depart the New York-based airline empty-handed.
May 22, 2018 at 01:22 PM
4 minute read
Courtesy photo.
JetBlue Airways Corp. has announced the retirement of longtime GC James Hnat, effective June 30.
A publicly filed separation agreement between the New York-based airline and Hnat, 47, indicates that the legal leader will be taking a pay package with him worth more than $1.2 million after he leaves the general counsel seat.
According to filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Hnat will fill a transitional role as an adviser for JetBlue, beginning July 1 and ending Dec. 31, 2018.
Filings said Hnat is to receive a base salary of $730,000 as an adviser—higher than his 2017 base of $435,000. He'll also get a lump sum “special bonus” of $500,000 to recognize his “significant efforts during his 17-year tenure with the airline to build and develop the legal department” and his efforts to “support innovation” with the formation of JetBlue Technology Ventures.
The departing GC will also receive $40,000 for a career transition, up to $30,000 for moving expenses and $5,000 for continuing legal education (CLE) costs. And, of course, Hnat gets some lifetime flight benefits, too.
To receive the compensation package, he agreed to several provisions including noncompete and non-disparagement agreements and a confidentiality provision.
Hnat, who is a named executive officer with the company, revealed on May 17, the same day as the airline's annual shareholder meeting, that he would be retiring.
In an announcement issued the next day, JetBlue CEO Robin Hayes thanked Hnat, who joined the airline in 2001, for his service.
“Jim's leadership has contributed to JetBlue's success from its early days as a startup airline to the admired and trusted brand it has become today,” Hayes said.
JetBlue's latest proxy statement refers to retirement provisions for “retirement eligible crew members,” and stated employees can receive either accelerated or continued vesting of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance share units (PSUs).
However, Hnat's agreement indicated he will forfeit his unvested restricted stock units and performance share units at the termination of his employment. According to the document, Hnat holds nearly 16,000 stock units in JetBlue that will continue to vest and it appears he will likely forfeit more than 54,000 shares.
The recent JetBlue proxy statement indicated “there are no named executive officers who are retirement eligible as of Dec. 31, 2017.”
A representative for JetBlue did not respond for comment for this article.
When Mark Powers, former chief financial officer, retired two years ago at the age of 64, his separation agreement indicated that he was leaving due to a retirement and referred to the departure as a retirement throughout the agreement, whereas Hnat's separation agreement does not reference a retirement but rather the fact that he “shall relinquish his role” at the end of next month.
Upon Hnat's departure, Brandon Nelson will serve as acting general counsel. He is currently an associate general counsel for the airline business. “He will oversee JetBlue's legal strategy and work closely with JetBlue's government and airport affairs team,” JetBlue said in its announcement last week.
Hnat, who did not respond for comment about his retirement or the terms of the separation agreement, said in the press release, “It's been an honor to serve JetBlue, our board of directors and all of our crew members over the past 17 years. In particular I'd like to thank the teams I've had the privilege to lead over the years and the values they have demonstrated in building JetBlue.”
As Hnat retires, another JetBlue lawyer is moving to the C-suite, but in a different role. The airline named Joanna Geraghty as its president and chief operating officer on May 18. She is a former associate general counsel and director of litigation and regulatory affairs at the company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoogle Fails to Secure Long-Term Stay of Order Requiring It to Open App Store to Rivals
'Am I Spending Time in the Right Place?' SPX Technologies CLO Cherée Johnson on Living and Leading With Intent
9 minute read'It Was the Next Graduation': How an In-House Lawyer Became a Serial Entrepreneur
9 minute readRenee Meisel, GC of UnitedLex, on Understanding and Growing the Business
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Founder of Failed Crypto Lender Confesses to Fraud
- 2How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
- 3Trump Seeks to Have Georgia Election Case Dismissed, Cites Presidential Immunity
- 4Elon Musk Has a Lot More Than a 'Tornetta' Appeal to Resolve in Delaware
- 5Case Will Test If Wrongful-Death Suit Can Be Brought for Fetus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250