Workday GC Jim Shaughnessy Shares Focuses on Data Privacy, GDPR
Shaughnessy, who joined the cloud computing company in 2011, believes that it's possible for in-house counsel baffled by data privacy and GDPR to "get up to speed very quickly."
May 23, 2018 at 02:12 PM
4 minute read
As an undergraduate, Workday Inc. general counsel Jim Shaughnessy studied political science and math. But he also found himself drawn to computers and information technology, writing code and programming.
“I developed an interest in information technology that I ended up putting aside in the first several years of my career,” he said.
Decades later, Shaughnessy has made his mark in-house by merging that early passion for technology with legal knowledge. He's spent more than 20 years as an in-house lawyer at various technology companies, including Hewlett Packard and Lenovo Group, most recently joining Pleasanton, California-based cloud computing company Workday as senior vice president, general counsel and secretary in 2011.
In each of those roles, Shaughnessy faced new legal challenges as companies' needs, the tech industry and GC responsibilities changed. Lately, Shaughnessy's focus has been on privacy.
“Coming to Workday, given the amount of data we have and the sensitivity of the data, it's fair to say that we're more focused on privacy than any of the other companies where I worked,” Shaughnessy said.
“[That's because of] the nature of our company and the times. I think that people are more aware of the potential for private data to become public and they're making sure that laws are adequate to protect people's private data and that companies comply with the law,” he added.
Shaughnessy listed privacy, cybersecurity and free flow of data as some of Workday's 2018 policy priorities. With the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation implementation date just days away, he's not the only legal leader with privacy and data on the brain.
Fortunately, Shaughnessy isn't new to the world of privacy. He said he's been paying attention to the privacy and data regulation space since around 2000.
“I think I first became aware of privacy as an area of practice, as an area that a general counsel needs to be concerned with, shortly after the [1995 European Data Protection Directive] was adopted in the early part of the century,” he said. “I was at that time working for Compaq and we appreciated the importance of privacy both for our own operations and our customers' operations as part of the legal management team. My involvement grew as my career progressed.”
During preparations for GDPR, Shaughnessy said his team has ensured that Workday customers know how to use their tools to comply with GDPR, while also ensuring the company itself was compliant. He said many customers came to Workday with questions on how to comply with the right to be forgotten and how to manage HR data. His team helped answer those questions.
For Workday, Shaughnessy said GDPR compliance was less of a challenge, because the company has been focused on privacy from its start.
“We've been working on GDPR since well before it was finalized roughly three years ago, closely following the proposals and counterproposals on the proposed regulation the last four or five years, and I believe we're ready to facilitate our customers compliance,” he said.
Last year, Workday offered a course for its in-house lawyers and privacy professionals to get certified by the International Association of Privacy Professionals and in 2016, Workday was added to the Department of Commerce list of self-certified Privacy Shield participants, indicating that it meets standards for personal data transfer between the EU and the U.S.
Shaughnessy has also advocated for free flow of data on Workday's blog and in company-hosted roundtables with EU representatives on data localization and flow.
For in-house leaders struggling to make sense of data privacy and GDPR, Shaughnessy said it's still possible to catch up.
“The good news is there are a great many resources available to help people get up to speed very quickly,” he said. “Many of the lawyers [who] work here and other privacy professionals belong to the IAPP, and it publishes materials that are quite good.”
The willingness to find resources and learn about new legal topics—privacy or otherwise—is important for those who want to excel in-house, Shaughnessy said.
“[A prospective GC should] really indulge his or her appetite for learning,” he said. “People who succeed as general counsel are usually among the most enthusiastic and active learners.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoogle Fails to Secure Long-Term Stay of Order Requiring It to Open App Store to Rivals
'Am I Spending Time in the Right Place?' SPX Technologies CLO Cherée Johnson on Living and Leading With Intent
9 minute read'It Was the Next Graduation': How an In-House Lawyer Became a Serial Entrepreneur
9 minute readRenee Meisel, GC of UnitedLex, on Understanding and Growing the Business
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250