The One Thing Missing From Most CLM Platforms
CLMs should be more than just a repository for contracts; they should also provide a means for attorneys and business teams to collaboratively negotiate contracts.
May 29, 2018 at 12:20 PM
4 minute read
Collaboration might not be the first thing that comes to mind when you think of lawyers, but many are discovering the words of poet Mattie Stepanek, that “Unity is strength … when there is teamwork and collaboration, wonderful things can be achieved.”
Even if they don't think of themselves as collaborators, lawyers usually are when it comes to drafting contracts. Contracts often require a lot of back and forth. For attorneys, contract management is one of their key collaboration points.
You might think that contract lifecycle management solutions (CLMs) would provide a means for such attorneys to collaborate. But, in practice, that's not the case. In my experience, most of the collaboration occurs via email. That's because most CLMs are all about the actual contracts—keeping, storing and retrieving them—rather than the contracting process.
That's a missed opportunity. CLMs should be more than just a repository for contracts; they should also provide a means for attorneys and business teams to collaboratively negotiate contracts.
Here's why:
- Any business' contracting process should be collaborative. If you have a CLM that doesn't offer a collaboration solution, then you need to seek another CLM or talk to your CLM provider about adding a collaboration solution. Contract management isn't a zero-sum game like litigation. Research from Harvard Law Distinguished Fellow Dr. Heidi Gardner has found that average revenue per client rises among firms that have a high degree of collaboration. That's because firms charge more for work that requires cross-disciplinary expertise. It should be a collaborative process, not a combative process. In general, lawyers are being asked to do more work in less time than in the past. On the positive side, social media and collaborative tools offer more resources than ever to pool their resources.
- Email overload. Email is a woefully inefficient form of communication. The average worker already spends 28 percent of their workday on email, and workers tend to be more long-winded in emails than in everyday speech. There is also a lot of fluidity within the contracting process that email doesn't handle well. For instance, there are moments in which it makes sense to bring in a new person to the conversation but they don't need to stay on after that. That's awkward in email but easier in chat or in a social platform.
- Avoid reinventing the wheel. Much of the contracting process is about synthesizing rather than creating something from scratch. In theory, the strength of a CLM platform is its ability to tap into institutional knowledge that will save work and enhance operational efficiency. A collaboration platform also lets you tap into knowledge outside your company—something that's more difficult via email as well.
- It drives greater bonds. Studies have shown that one of the best ways to improve morale at your company, or to have a high morale to begin with, is to recognize your employees' contributions. A collaboration platform is an excellent way to achieve this goal. By including employees in the process, managers are implicitly and explicitly ensuring that their employees' contributions are being noted and valued. Collaboration through an enterprise social platform can be a lot of fun and forge stronger bonds between colleagues. These benefits should be obvious to any legal department, but the reality is that collaboration is lacking in most CLMs.
That's changing, however, and it's often emerging lawyers who are realizing the benefits of collaboration. In fact, an American Bar Association survey from 2017 found that 57 percent of lawyers under the age of 40 accessed documents and case-related information stored online.
It is clear that the market is requiring a better, more collaborative solution. Smart CLMs should be listening.
Monica Zent is an entrepreneur, investor, businesswoman and legal adviser to leading global brands. Her most recent venture is founder & CEO of Foxwordy Inc., the digital collaboration platform for the legal industry. She is also founder of ZentLaw, one of the nation's top alternative law firms. She is a diversity and inclusion advocate, inspiring all people to pursue their dreams.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Federal Pregnancy Regulations: Five Key Takeaways and Five Key Action Steps for Employers
7 minute readLegal Profession's Mental Health Woes Start to Take Root in Law School, Many Attorneys Say
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Veritext Legal Solutions Announces the Past Acquisitions of Three Alternative Dispute Resolution Firms
- 2Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 3LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 4An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 5Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250