GCs: How to Manage New Hire Expectations
The results from the 2018 Career Satisfaction survey for in-house counsel make it abundantly clear that most of you crave upward mobility.
June 05, 2018 at 11:55 AM
4 minute read
The results from the 2018 Career Satisfaction survey for in-house counsel make it abundantly clear that most of you crave upward mobility.
When we present a new opportunity to a candidate, especially if the position is at a senior counsel or assistant general counsel level, one of the first questions we are inevitably asked is the ladder climb one: what is the likelihood and time frame for promotion? This question is asked well before we even get to the first interview. Experienced in-house counsel are more realistic and logical when evaluating the lay of the land, versus straight-from-a-law-firm candidates, but that's simply because in-house counsel have seen the dynamic firsthand. Bottom line is that everyone asks.
So, if you are the General Counsel, seeking to make a new hire, how do you manage promotion and title expectations? Unless the hire is being made with successorship specifically in mind, you want to be careful, while also using this as an opportunity to test on culture fit.
There are two very different ways a general counsel can view this topic, and I have lots of experience with both. About half of you take this view: I want someone who will be happy in the role as-is, who won't bug me on day two for a promotion, and who won't fit culturally if they are restless and thinking about titles. About half of you take this view: I want Type A driven ambitious hires, and I'll manage it.
Only hire people who are aligned with your way of thinking about the opportunity at hand and career advancement generally! And be ridiculously candid, with your recruiter and with the candidate directly, about what the new hire should expect. Never oversell the opportunity. Even if you fall into the camp of GCs who want restlessly ambitious souls, be realistic with them about how far and how fast they can really go under your umbrella.
There are some questions you can ask to get a sense of the expectations you will inevitable need to manage post hire. The “where do you see yourself in five years” question is helpful. I recommend asking the candidate about promotions at prior companies or firms. How did the promotional opportunity come about? Expected or unexpected? Did the candidate leap frog a more senior attorney in landing a promotion? Did he or she have to ask for the promotion? Questions along these lines will give you a sense not only of the individual's expectations, but also of the corporate culture at which he or she cut their teeth.
Most candidates for in-house positions know, either from experience or because they have been coached, to take a modest approach at the interview. The “aw shucks” I just want to add value and be a good team player approach. That is, frankly, the best approach for a candidate to take in the absence of more information about what the interviewer may prefer. If you are the GC, you want to press with questions that will test if you are hearing the candidate's true self, or if you are getting an interview persona.
Most GCs assume attorneys are fairly ambitious, and their “bs” radar starts to kick in when candidates get a little too humble. There is some back and forth to this conversation that can start to feel a little sterile. My advice is to persistently press until you feel the interviewee is “getting real” with you. And then hire the person who fits with the expectations you feel good about managing.
Mike Evers recruits attorneys for corporate legal departments throughout the United States. Visit www.everslegal.com. His firm also offers experienced in-house counsel to companies on an adjunct basis.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 120 New Judges? Connecticut Could Get Wave of Jurists
- 2Orrick Loses 10-Lawyer Team to Herbert Smith in Germany
- 3‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Legal Arm of the Big Four Firm Entering the US
- 4Justice Marguerite Grays Elevated to Co-Chair Panel That Advises on Commercial Division
- 5McDermott Continues UK Growth With Another Partner Hire in London
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250