US to Lift Export Ban on China's ZTE, Embed 'Compliance Coordinators'
The U.S. Department of Commerce is cracking down on ZTE in some unprecedented ways.
June 07, 2018 at 01:22 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Department of Commerce Thursday announced new sanctions on the Chinese telecom giant ZTE Corp. that will replace the export denial order previously imposed.
Both the sanctions and the lifting of the export ban are in many ways unprecedented.
In a statement, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross said ZTE has agreed:
- To pay $1 billion in new penalties and place an additional $400 million in suspended penalty money in escrow, in addition to the $892 million in penalties already paid under a previous agreement, which ZTE breached.
- To embed a team of U.S.-appointed “compliance coordinators” who will answer to the U.S. government for 10 years. They will monitor ZTE's compliance with export laws.
- To replace its entire board of directors and senior leadership at both the parent company in Shenzhen and its other unit, known as ZTE Kangxun Telecommunications. ZTE has previously dismissed at least two general counsel and two compliance officers.
ZTE did not immediately release a statement about the new agreement on its website.
Ross' statement said this is the first time the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has required compliance coordinators in any case, and collectively these “are the most severe penalt[ies] … imposed on a company” by the bureau.
It remains to be seen how Congress will react to the news after some members had strongly opposed lifting the ban.
BIS imposed the export privilege ban in April, after ZTE failed to meet all the requirements of a plea deal made with the U.S. Department of Justice in March 2017. The plea deal settled charges that ZTE had illegally sold U.S. telecom parts and products to Iran and North Korea.
Ross said the new agreement will suspend the export denial order, but keep it ready to activate “in the event of additional violations during the 10-year probationary period.”
Ross concluded, “Today, BIS is imposing the largest penalty it has ever levied and requiring that ZTE adopt unprecedented compliance measures. We will closely monitor ZTE's behavior. If they commit any further violations, we would again be able to deny them access to U.S. technology as well as collect the additional $400 million in escrow.”
It was not immediately clear how the appointment of compliance coordinators affects the U.S. corporate monitor already in place at ZTE. But a Commerce Department spokesperson said the monitor issue and other questions would be answered when the full agreement is made public “soon.”
Dallas lawyer James Stanton was appointed as monitor by U.S. District Judge Ed Kinkeade, who oversaw the plea deal. Stanton began his duties last July.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHarris' Promised Ban on Food Price Gouging Could Be Difficult to Implement, Antitrust Experts Say
3 minute readFacebook, Nvidia Make High Court Case Against Investor Suits
Kroger Suit Claims FTC Using Unconstitutional Process to Try to Kill Megamerger
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250