US to Lift Export Ban on China's ZTE, Embed 'Compliance Coordinators'
The U.S. Department of Commerce is cracking down on ZTE in some unprecedented ways.
June 07, 2018 at 01:22 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Department of Commerce Thursday announced new sanctions on the Chinese telecom giant ZTE Corp. that will replace the export denial order previously imposed.
Both the sanctions and the lifting of the export ban are in many ways unprecedented.
In a statement, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross said ZTE has agreed:
- To pay $1 billion in new penalties and place an additional $400 million in suspended penalty money in escrow, in addition to the $892 million in penalties already paid under a previous agreement, which ZTE breached.
- To embed a team of U.S.-appointed “compliance coordinators” who will answer to the U.S. government for 10 years. They will monitor ZTE's compliance with export laws.
- To replace its entire board of directors and senior leadership at both the parent company in Shenzhen and its other unit, known as ZTE Kangxun Telecommunications. ZTE has previously dismissed at least two general counsel and two compliance officers.
ZTE did not immediately release a statement about the new agreement on its website.
Ross' statement said this is the first time the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has required compliance coordinators in any case, and collectively these “are the most severe penalt[ies] … imposed on a company” by the bureau.
It remains to be seen how Congress will react to the news after some members had strongly opposed lifting the ban.
BIS imposed the export privilege ban in April, after ZTE failed to meet all the requirements of a plea deal made with the U.S. Department of Justice in March 2017. The plea deal settled charges that ZTE had illegally sold U.S. telecom parts and products to Iran and North Korea.
Ross said the new agreement will suspend the export denial order, but keep it ready to activate “in the event of additional violations during the 10-year probationary period.”
Ross concluded, “Today, BIS is imposing the largest penalty it has ever levied and requiring that ZTE adopt unprecedented compliance measures. We will closely monitor ZTE's behavior. If they commit any further violations, we would again be able to deny them access to U.S. technology as well as collect the additional $400 million in escrow.”
It was not immediately clear how the appointment of compliance coordinators affects the U.S. corporate monitor already in place at ZTE. But a Commerce Department spokesperson said the monitor issue and other questions would be answered when the full agreement is made public “soon.”
Dallas lawyer James Stanton was appointed as monitor by U.S. District Judge Ed Kinkeade, who oversaw the plea deal. Stanton began his duties last July.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHarris' Promised Ban on Food Price Gouging Could Be Difficult to Implement, Antitrust Experts Say
3 minute readFacebook, Nvidia Make High Court Case Against Investor Suits
Kroger Suit Claims FTC Using Unconstitutional Process to Try to Kill Megamerger
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250