Top Experts Explore Visa Options for Foreign Entrepreneurs
In this roundtable, our panel of experts (Susan J. Cohen, Niko Bonatsos, Jeff Clavier, Sascha Eder and Jeff Farrah) share their insight about the limitations of common work visa options foreign entrepreneurs are forced to consider (H-1B, E-2, and F-1 visas) and the merits of the International Entrepreneur Parole Program — a program that the Trump Administration has proposed to remove.
June 26, 2018 at 09:43 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Introduction The Panelists Susan J. Cohen (SJC): Mintz Levin Niko Bonatsos (NB): General Catalyst Jeff Clavier (JC): Uncork Capital Sascha Eder (SE): NewtonX Jeff Farrah (JF): National Venture Capital Association What impact does (a) the lack of sufficient H-1B visas and (b) the “control” requirement have on America's start-ups and early stage companies? SJC: NB: JC: SE: www.itif.org JF: In light of the foreign ownership and foreign investment requirement of the E-2 visa, is this a useful visa for America's start-ups and early-stage companies? What risks does the foreign ownership requirement and automatic loss of the visa status upon dilution of ownership pose to U.S. venture capital firms and other U.S. investors? SJC: NB: JC: SE:
- The ownership rule of 50% is often feasible for a startup with no funding but as soon as the company needs funding it becomes extremely difficult to maintain this percentage.
- Furthermore, most successful startups have two-three co-founders, which means that the person requiring the E2 Visa needs more than 50% ownership which often does not work in light of the co-founders. The E2 visa makes it very unattractive for investors to invest who pick from thousands of startups, as it creates many constraints and challenges.
- The fact that the E2 becomes void once U.S. investment in the business reaches 50% means that it doesn't provide a path to a green card or any other alternative means that the entrepreneur has to keep working on a long-term solution.
- The initial capital requirements are also difficult to obtain. Often at least $100,000 if not more must have been invested irreversibly and it would often be counterproductive for entrepreneurs to invest this kind of capital in the very beginning when the startup is supposed to be very lean and might not even require such an investment yet.
JF: How would the IEP Program benefit U.S. start-up companies and the U.S. investment community? SJC: NB: JC: SE: JF: What is your reaction to the proposed rescission of the IEP program, despite the overwhelming support for the program by the public? SJC: NB: JC: https://tcrn.ch/2LfbtYn See https://twitter.com/jeff/status/1002591918826631168/photo/1 SE: JF: June 28 How has the start-up and investment community benefited from the 12-month and additional 24-month OPT extension? How would the elimination of the STEP OPT Extension impact start-ups and early stage companies? SJC: NB: JC: SE: What changes to the F-1 student visa post-graduation work authorization rules would benefit the U.S. venture and investment community? Do you agree that only STEM fields should benefit from an additional 24-months of OPT authorization? For example, a typical MBA degree is not considered a STEM degree. SJC: JC: SE: e.g. Nicholas Gaffney Marketing the Law Firm [email protected]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHarris' Promised Ban on Food Price Gouging Could Be Difficult to Implement, Antitrust Experts Say
3 minute readFacebook, Nvidia Make High Court Case Against Investor Suits
Kroger Suit Claims FTC Using Unconstitutional Process to Try to Kill Megamerger
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250