The Reviews Are in: EY's Acquisition of Riverview Law Has Grabbed Legal Departments' Attention
Asked about EY's latest move into the legal market, one GC said the idea of having legal service providers only owned and operated by lawyers is "narrow-minded and dated."
August 10, 2018 at 12:52 PM
4 minute read
This week's announcement that Big Four accounting firm Ernst & Young has purchased London-based alternative legal services provider, Riverview Law, has law firms doing plenty of hand-wringing.
But without the interest of clients—the present and future purchasers of Big Four legal services—the much-feared threat from the EYs and Deloittes of the world wouldn't quite seem so scary.
Those on the client side told Corporate Counsel that the Riverview acquisition, the first Big Four purchase of an established legal-managed services provider, is in fact piquing their interest. And they are by no means surprised by this initial Big Four foray into ASPs.
“This is good for the legal industry and clients. Clients are increasingly in need of efficient, flexible service providers of every stripe—accounting, payroll processing, legal—especially for process-heavy work that can be made more efficient (or be outright done) by technology,” Amit Khanna, general counsel of office space startup Knotel, said in an email.
➤➤ Want to keep an eye on legal industry disruptors? Sign up here for The Law Firm Disrupted from Law.com.
The purchase of Riverview Law means that EY will now own the managed service provider's manpower and technology, which includes new dashboard and matter tracking capabilities for legal departments and contract management solutions. The acquisition also ramps up the number of lawyers working for EY globally to a total of 2,200 in 81 jurisdictions.
Khanna said in the email that if EY can package Riverview's capabilities with its current services, it will be a “boon for clients.”
“I also think the idea of legal service providers being owned and operated only by lawyers is narrow-minded and dated,” Khanna said, adding that Knotel has actually considered starting or acquiring a captive law firm of its own to service the company's internal legal needs more efficiently.
Connie Brenton, the director of legal operations at NetApp Inc. and CEO of Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC), said in an email that this week's EY announcement is merely the “tip of the iceberg.”
“We are no longer talking about what is coming, as these changes have arrived. They are here. Now they are simply growing in scope and in size,” she said. “The total legal available market coupled with the current transformation to how legal services are delivered make[s] the legal industry highly attractive to not only the Big Four but to technology providers, law companies, alternative legal providers as well as to private equity companies and venture capitalists.”
Brenton said that every week she's seen some kind of merger or acquisition related to an advancement or revolution in the legal industry.
EY hasn't been the only Big Four firm to make waves. In June, Deloitte announced an alliance with the U.S. immigration law firm Berry Appleman & Leiden. Deloitte U.K. also acquired the firm's non-U.S. business that extends throughout more than eight different countries.
Legal departments are paying attention, but whether or not the Riverview acquisition and the expansion of the Big Four will actually inspire general counsel to give these service providers more business remains to be seen.
“Legal operations executives and GCs moving work to the Big Four will depend on how the Big Four continue to scale and what their engagement models look like,” wrote Brenton. “There are others within the legal ecosystem that are larger and have a more broad offering, like Axiom, Elevate, Integreon, Quislex and UnitedLex and have extensive experience providing offerings and easy engagement models.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
- 2People in the News—Nov. 22, 2024—Marshall Dennehey, Buchanan Ingersoll
- 3$83M Verdict After $100K Demand Rejected in Henry County
- 4Samsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
- 5How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250