Creating a Digital-Ready Legal Department
Legal departments must support traditional industry concerns and understand the changes that technology brings to markets, value, risk and processes.
August 14, 2018 at 03:22 PM
6 minute read
As barriers to entry change and profits consolidate to fewer companies, CEOs are under increased pressure to pioneer new products, services and business models. According to Gartner's Digital Enterprise 2020 survey, 68 percent of CEOs plan to increase their investments in digital capabilities, while 67 percent agree that their organization must become significantly more digitized to maintain their competitiveness. Digitization—the process of applying digital technology to conduct an activity that had previously been done through analog means—has become a corporate imperative.
For general counsel, growing corporate digitization means legal departments must change. Where once general counsel served in a pharmaceutical, retail, financial services, or manufacturing company, they now also provide counsel to a technology company. Legal departments must support traditional industry concerns and understand the changes that technology brings to markets, value, risk and processes. To support their companies, legal departments will need to ensure that they are digital-ready.
|Understanding the Nature of Digital Business
Some implications of digital business are obvious. The use of new technologies and entry into new markets means new-to-company profit models, processes, third parties and customers. As companies digitize operations and transform their business, the work of in-house counsel will naturally change.
But digital doesn't just mean changes in transactions, contract types and data rights. Digital markets and digital processes don't behave like “analog” markets and processes. Gartner research has identified a few fundamental ways in which digital business is different.
|What Digital Changes
- The sources of corporate value. New markets and technologies alter the importance of specific firm assets (g., the value of information, IP and market position). If your company engages in an asset-lite business strategy based on customer information, the value of data rights and the importance of negotiations with cloud and service providers will increase dramatically. Digital changes what's important to the firm, altering both the firm's risk appetite and legal's interpretation of risk. These changes must be clearly communicated throughout the department and to non-legal stakeholders.
- Roles and accountability. A typical digital project has six team members, 10 stakeholders, and a wide network of partners on which value capture depends. Further, digital technologies erode traditional boundaries, creating unclear roles and accountabilities across jobs and functions. In a digital world, it's difficult to determine who should provide input and who has decision rights.
- Project and transaction requirements. Agile and DevOps methodologies follow iterative processes with changing goals, flexible requirements and rapid launches. Legal can no longer expect clear terms at project outset and must be ready for project launches at a moment's notice.
- Drivers of risk creation. Sources of risk creation shift as automated processes reduce the number of employees creating risk. Legal departments will, as automation takes hold, need to shift oversight from individual functions and employees to the creators of underlying processes and algorithms.
- Risk certainty. As the decision-making process of algorithms and the legal interpretation of liability becomes less clear, the predictability of legal risk decreases. In some cases, legal will have to operate with less certainty.
Taken together, digital business transformation means different sources of corporate value in a more complex operating environment and with less certain legal risks.
|Preparing the Digital Foundation
So how does a legal department prepare itself for digital business? To find out, Gartner analyzed more than 1,700 digital projects including marketing analytics initiatives, AI-powered chatbots, and construction of e-commerce platforms. We asked how the projects were governed, which stakeholders were involved, the timing of legal's involvement and the use of legal self-service tools. In short, we wanted to understand how legal departments can best support digital projects.
What did we learn? We learned that no amount or quality of client-lawyer service or relationship is sufficient for success in a digital world. No matter how well a lawyer personally supports a project—early involvement, continuous and customized support, solutions-orientation—it only has moderate impact on the success of the project or on legal risk management. In fact, having a lawyer “along for the ride” without a clear, distinct role adds real time and financial costs to projects. If you haven't defined precise project roles, legal involvement can negatively impact on-time project delivery and/or risk management.
What matters in a digital environment is how the legal department prepares to support digital projects. Legal departments must clearly define when they will engage on projects, coordinate involvement with other stakeholders, and empower the business to act independently within defined parameters. General counsel can improve digital success by:
- Coordinating stakeholder roles and responsibilities. The increasing number of stakeholders in corporate processes makes actively reducing complexity in workflows essential. This means creating role clarity, assigning decision rights, and designing cross-functional processes wherever roles are unclear—whether in information governance, procurement contracting, IT project assessments, or any other workflow. Holistic design thinking helps reimagine corporate processes while rationalizing stakeholder involvement.
- Defining business enablement. This means specifying how and when legal engages on a project and, to the extent possible, enabling the business to move forward without direct legal involvement. When creating processes, legal must aim for minimally restrictive guidance, removing any requirement that doesn't clearly articulate how it materially addresses total business risk.
- Building a rapid response capability. Legal departments need the dual ability to recognize new patterns in business (e.g., the need to routinely onboard cloud service providers) and quickly build out repeatable support that allows the business to move forward. This requires staff time committed toward the development of scalable processes and a real capability to execute department projects quickly. Increasingly, legal departments have brought Agile methodology processes to bear on commercial contracting processes, creation of contract playbooks, and vendor due diligence requirements.
These actions work because they address the core operating complexity and ambiguity inherent in digital business. And for the additional upfront investment these capabilities require, legal departments see real returns and long-term time savings. Legal departments with the above capabilities increase on-time project delivery by 63 percent and increase appropriate legal and compliance risk-taking by 46 percent. That is, these legal departments help execute digital projects faster while better managing their risk.
|Creating a Digital-Ready Department
Corporate digitization requires a departmentwide focus on the complexity and ambiguity inherent in digital business. This requires cross-functional coordination of business processes, carefully defined legal engagements, and building a rapid response capability. Legal departments that get this right will help their firms capitalize on the promise of digital business transformation.
Abbott Martin is a legal research leader at Gartner, a research and advisory company headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250