How In-House Counsel at Swiss Bank Ticked Off Prosecutors ... and the Company Paid for It
Attorneys at Zürcher Kantonalbank, the fourth-largest bank in Switzerland, found a way to make an already challenging federal investigation even more adversarial.
August 14, 2018 at 05:08 PM
4 minute read
Here's a sure way to lose half your cooperation credit in a federal investigation: Let your in-house counsel advise employees not to cooperate with U.S. prosecutors.
That's what Swiss government-owned Zürcher Kantonalbank did, and now it owes the United States $98.5 million in restitution, forfeiture and fines. The Zurich-area institution is the largest canton (township) bank and the fourth-largest bank in Switzerland.
U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan Tuesday announced reaching a three-year deferred prosecution agreement with the ZKB. The bank admitted to conspiring to help U.S. taxpayer-clients evade about $39 million in taxes by hiding their funds in offshore accounts at the bank from 2002 to 2009.
In a statement, the ZKB said paying the penalty “will have no negative impact on the bank's 2018 financial results.” It said it has “adjusted its cross-border wealth management business since 2009,” and is “committed to a strict tax-compliance business policy,” focusing on markets in Europe.
Dr. Jörg Müller-Ganz, chairman of the board of directors, said in the statement, “We are relieved that after seven years, we were able to conclude the investigation following an objective dialogue with the U.S. authorities. The solution that has now been reached marks the end of this matter and removes any related uncertainties. We look forward to forging ahead with the positive development of our bank.”
In its own statement, the U.S. Attorney's Office said, “The amount of ZKB's cooperation credit was reduced [50 percent] by the government due to ZKB's actions … in dissuading two indicted ZKB bankers from cooperating with U.S. authorities for years after their indictment.”
The two indicted bankers, Stephan Fellmann and Christof Reist, also pleaded guilty Tuesday for their role in the conspiracy. Both are Swiss citizens. They each face up to one year in prison at their sentencing hearings, scheduled for Nov. 30.
The statement of facts within the DPA describes how the bank lost its cooperation credit.
The document says the bank retained independent U.S. counsel for the indicted bankers to avoid any conflict of interest. But, it adds, for two years starting in 2013, unnamed in-house counsel, at times joined by personnel from the human resources department, “regularly met with Fellmann and Reist.”
The document said without U.S. counsel present, ZKB's “in-house counsel discussed … substantive and strategic matters relevant to the pending U.S. criminal case, as well as job placements and career development.”
It continues, “In-house counsel informed Fellmann and Reist that it was the bank's view that they should wait to resolve their criminal cases in conjunction with ZKB reaching a resolution with U.S. authorities because it would be in the bankers' best interests to resolve their cases along with the bank rather than separately.” It adds, Fellmann and Reist “felt dissuaded from reaching out” to U.S. prosecutors.
Fellmann and Reist also “felt that their continued employment at ZKB and ZKB's ongoing payment of their legal fees would be threatened should they take steps that were viewed by ZKB as inconsistent with the bank's own interests. Due in part to these discussions, Fellmann and Reist did not seek to cooperate with the United States until the summer of 2015,” the document said.
Needless to say, the prosecutors were not pleased. “The government views the actions of ZKB with respect to indicted bankers Fellmann and Reist, described in the statement of facts, as inconsistent with a policy of full cooperation,” it said.
The DPA was signed by Thomas Fischer, general counsel at ZKB since the beginning of 2017, and by outside counsel Philip Urofsky, of Shearman & Sterling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Ballooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
Am Law 100 Partners on Trump’s Short List to Replace Gensler as SEC Chair
4 minute readElon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250