5 Companies That Have Entered the Firearms Debate
This week, Shopify joined a growing group of companies that have come out with new policies and strong statements in response to the ongoing debate over guns.
August 16, 2018 at 03:34 PM
3 minute read
On Wednesday, the popular e-commerce platform Shopify announced that it will no longer allow merchants to sell certain firearms and parts for those weapons.
According to The Seattle Times, Ottawa, Canada-based Shopify, which is used by more than 600,000 businesses globally, will no longer permit the sale of items including automatic weapons and silencers used with semi-automatic weapons.
Shopify is not the first company to make news for getting political about the ongoing gun debate. In the past year, an increasing number of companies have taken actions such as restricting discounts for National Rifle Association members and tightening controls around gun sales.
Though it's not clear how heavily legal departments have been involved in these specific decisions, there's little doubt that GCs everywhere have responsibility for a company's public positions, and that they often get a direct say (or get to be the speaker) when these companies get political.
Aside from Shopify, here are five other companies that made big statements or policy changes because of the gun debate.
- Dick's Sporting Goods: Following the realization that the company sold a shotgun to the perpetrator of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida, the retailer, whose legal department is led by John Hayes, announced in February that it would no longer sell “assault style rifles.” It also stopped selling firearms or ammunition to anyone under 21 years old.
- Walmart Inc.: After the Parkland shooting, Walmart also announced some changes. Like Dick's Sporting Goods, it raised the age of buying ammunition to 21. At the time, the company reiterated that back in 2015 it had stopped selling “modern sporting rifles” including the AR-15. Walmart's legal team is led by Karen Roberts.
- Bank of America Corp.: In April, Bank of America said that it will stop giving loans to manufacturers of “military-style firearms” that are sold for civilian use, according to The Washington Post. Vice chairwoman of the bank, Anne M. Finucane, made the announcement during a television interview. BOA's legal team is led by David G. Leitch.
- United Airlines Inc: In a tweet in February, the airline announced that it would no longer honor discounts to NRA members around the group's annual meeting. The announcement by the company, which counts Brett Hart as head of its legal department, was met with particular ire from NRA members. During a Q&A with CEO Oscar Munoz, an NRA member suggested the CEO and company were “virtue signaling,” though Munoz responded that the decision was personal and not political for the company.
- FedEx: Despite gun-control activists' threats to boycott the shipping company, FedEx said it will still honor NRA discounts following the Parkland shooting. It said that to remove those discounts would be to discriminate a group of people. However, in the same statement, the company said it disagrees with the NRA and does not believe that assault rifles should be in the hands of civilians. The legal team at FedEx is led by Mark Allen.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readWells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readMLB's Texas Rangers Search for a New GC and a Broadcasting Deal
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250