How Tech Companies Can Prep for Possible Loss of H-1B Spouse Work Permits
A Trump policy discontinuing at least some H-4 visa work permits for the spouses of foreign-born workers has advanced another step through the rulemaking process.
August 23, 2018 at 12:17 PM
3 minute read
The spouses of H-1B visa holders—who hold H-4 visas—could lose their right to work in the United States under a Trump administration policy change in the works.
Silicon Valley news outlet The Mercury News reported Wednesday that senior leaders in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security have moved a step closer toward final approval of a policy change, part of Trump's “Buy American and Hire American” executive order, that would stop at least some H-1B spouses from working in the country.
If the change goes through, some immigration lawyers say it could hurt American tech companies, which employ many H-1B holders, as it would make the U.S. a less attractive spot for global top talent.
“People could cut their assignments short because the spouse is not able to work, or they might not be willing to accept an assignment in the United States at all because the spouse is not able to work,” said Valentine Brown, a partner at Duane Morris who deals with immigration issues.
Brown said it's easier in many other countries for spouses to get work permits, and top talent may choose to go there from the start.
If H-1B workers already in the U.S. leave—because their spouse doesn't want to live in a place where they can't work, or because the family can't live on one income—employee relocation costs could be high. Companies often spend thousands of dollars sponsoring H-1B workers, a process that takes a lot of both money and time.
“It can be very costly for employers when things like this change,” Brown said. She noted that, in an economy with low unemployment it could also be harmful for employers to lose workers they need to function.
H-4 visa holders' employers should keep in mind these employees may not have working rights in the U.S. should the policy change go through, said Caroline Tang, a shareholder at Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart who works on immigration cases. Employers should know when workers' current permits expire, and be aware of the potential that they'll be un-renewable.
Brown said employers can also have an open door policy for workers concerned about the potential end to H-4 visa work permits, so employees can ask questions and feel secure that the company is staying on top of any immigration law changes.
The work permits are a fairly recent development. Tang noted that the government only began to issue them back in 2015 under President Barack Obama.
“Before [that], a lot of these H-4 spouses just never worked,” Tang said. “They just came to the U.S.—a lot of them would give up their jobs at home—and never be a part of the U.S. workforce.”
In addition to the growing H-4 threat, the Trump White House has also criticized the H-1B program itself. A recent study from the National Foundation for American Policy showed that between the third and fourth quarter of FY 2017 the proportion of H-1B visas denied to foreign-born workers increased by 41 percent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250