How GCs Struggle (And Succeed) After Retirement
“People treat it like they don't want to talk about it, like it doesn't happen,” said one retired GC. “If you're not thinking about this, you should be.”
August 27, 2018 at 01:18 PM
7 minute read
Jetting along in high-powered positions, top in-house lawyers can make the mistake of failing to prepare for the day when their landing gear drops for the last time. But what happens after that final flight? What is it like when the phone goes silent and the constant flow of emails slows to a trickle?
“It almost feels like it's a plane that has hit the runway and the thrusters are on and you come to a complete stop on that front of your life. Everything just stops,” said Ed Ryan, who retired last year as general counsel and executive vice president of Marriott International Inc. “When you leave a corporation, the door shuts pretty quickly behind you. Everything pretty much goes away. A lot of people are surprised by it.”
Retirement shock is due, at least in part, to a cultural tendency among GCs to ignore the Exit sign in the legal department as if it were a speck hovering far off on the horizon, more easily ignored than confronted, according to Ryan.
“People treat it like they don't want to talk about it, like it doesn't happen,” he said. “If you're not thinking about this, you should be.”
Former in-house leaders have certainly struggled to navigate through retirement. But in the process, they've also found some fulfilling—and in some cases very creative—ways to spend their time and even give back.
'No longer part of the money train'
Ryan, who spent 21 years in-house at Marriott, said that GCs who are standing on the precipice of retirement should prepare for their “work tribe” to essentially vanish. “You'll still have friends from work,” he said. “But that social circle, it's not around you anymore. And the people who are working, they're busy and you're not part of that.”
Marla Persky, who retired in 2013 as senior VP, GC and corporate secretary for pharmaceutical company Boehringer Ingelheim, said she knew it was time to stop when she realized she “no longer had the fire in the belly.” She was 58.
Other GCs lose their drive without knowing it and one day they get left behind as the company keeps flying forward—a fate that Persky was keen to sidestep: “I never wanted to be one of those people,” she said. “I was very lucky. I got to leave at my own time on my own terms.”
Perksy left, but she didn't slow down. She now works as a senior adviser at the consulting and recruitment firm BarkerGilmore and is CEO and president of WOMN LLC, which she co-founded in 2014 with the aim of helping women lawyers advance into executive roles and join the C-suite. The company offers mentorship and consulting services.
She said one piece of advice she'd give to retiring GCs who plan to go into business is to not “naively assume” that the outside law firms they'd worked with will morph into clients for their next venture. She'd thought that the “firms to which I'd given millions and millions of dollars of business during my career as a general counsel would reciprocate and hire me to help their women partners succeed.”
“But those firms that I gave the most business to didn't really have any use for me after I was no longer part of the money train,” she said.
Like many retired GCs, Persky also serves on nonprofit and for-profit boards. And she discovered a way to combine her love of food, travel and business by becoming the founder and CEO of Epicurean Travel, which puts together food-centric vacations for small groups seeking to “be immersed in the historical, cultural distinctiveness, and culinary delights of locations around the world.”
'I wasn't ready for retirement'
Having a “mosaic” of interests to pursue post retirement is key, said Ben Heineman, who spent 16 years as General Electric's senior VP and GC before he retired in 2005. Now, he teaches, writes and serves on several nonprofit boards.
“To me the biggest thing was freedom,” Heineman said. “I've been involved in big government, big law and big business for my whole career and I very much did not want to have clients calling me, CEOs calling me, meetings to go to. I wanted to be free.”
Freedom for Mike Dillon, who retired in July from his position as Adobe's top lawyer, the fourth GC post he'd held, meant baking sourdough bread, a lot of it—he said he made two loaves a day for the first three weeks after he left Adobe. Then Dillon turned to another passion: cycling. He'd already written a book about riding his bike across the country. Seeking a new adventure, he and his youngest son, a recent college grad, set off Aug. 8 to ride gravel bikes along a 2,768 mile trail that follows the Continental Divide between Canada and New Mexico.
Dillon also was part of a team behind a documentary film about climate change and the decline of sea ice.
“Just enjoy life. You really need to have a demarcation, a way of decompressing from decades in corporate culture,” he advised. At the same time, he cautioned, “Before you make that decision [to retire] put together a list of everything in the world you'd like to do so you're not just watching daytime TV and eating too much.”
Michael Callahan, who left his role at LinkedIn earlier this year, agreed. The former GC, who now runs Stanford Law School's Rock Center for Corporate Governance, said GCs who are considering retirement or a career change should “take the time and be intentional about the work” they want to do and talk with people who are doing that work.
“I wasn't ready for retirement,” said Callahan. The 50-year-old had been a GC for about 15 years, first at Yahoo and then at Auction.com, now Ten-X.com, before joining LinkedIn about four years ago. “I certainly thought about the transition for some time and felt like throwing myself into a new challenge, which has been rewarding.”
'Certain amount of impostor syndrome'
For some GCs, including Mark LeHocky, who served as the head lawyer for Ross Stores, Inc. and Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc., walking away from the legal department was relatively easy. LeHocky had been doing pro bono mediation work on the side for years before he retired and became a full-time mediator. He's also teaching at UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business.
“It was seamless,” LeHocky said of leaving the GC life.
But he might be an exception. Jay Mitchell, the former chief corporate counsel at Levi Strauss & Co. and now a professor at Stanford Law School, said he was both “thrilled and terrified” when he left the in-house world. And he described the first couple of years as being “pretty rough.”
“There was a certain amount of impostor syndrome,” he said of entering academia. But he added, “In many ways, people who work in-house, and particularly general counsel, bring a lot of value to teaching inside a law school. You've seen things from a broader perspective than one gets at a law firm.”
While Ryan, the retired Marriott GC, has seen colleagues struggle in retirement, he said he's not had much difficulty adjusting.
“It's daunting if you define yourself by what you're doing with your work or your title,” Ryan said. “I was fortunate because I never really defined myself that way. But I think there's a natural tendency to do that.”
Like Dillon, the ex-Adobe GC, Ryan is a longtime cyclist. He said he'd been biking “off and on” while he was a GC—but in retirement, he was able to go all in. He recently spent a week riding in South Africa. Before that he was cycling in Spain. And now he's planning to bike from Pittsburgh to Washington, D.C.
“The decision you've got to make is, 'Am I really going to retire?'” he said. “Make that decision and don't go half-ass on it.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
$25M Grubhub Settlement Sheds Light on How Other Gig Economy Firms Can Avoid Regulatory Trouble
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250