Hey GCs, Want That Compensation in Cash or Cryptocurrency?
At least one company is seeking a general counsel who will get compensated in Ethereum. As crypto booms, there could be more to come.
August 29, 2018 at 08:30 AM
3 minute read
In-house counsel have already started entering the fast-growing, complicated world of cryptocurrencies.
But legal leaders aren't just taking jobs in companies that work with crypto—some are actually getting paid in it. Or will be, once they're hired.
One such offer was posted by blockchain network organization district0x. The company is seeking a GC and says the salary will be “paid in Ethereum (but denominated in dollars!),” meaning the salary will be listed in dollar amount but actually paid in crypto.
According to the posting, the hired GC also will receive an “additional cryptocurrency-based compensation package,” a hardware wallet to store all that Ethereum and a ”firsthand look into the birth of an industry.” The GC will lead global privacy protection initiatives and develop service agreements and contracts.
Although the pay is certainly unique, some requirements to work at district0x as GC don't look so different from other companies' standards for prospective GCs. Candidates should have a JD, a bar membership, strong writing skills and in-house experience in the fintech space or in dealing with financial regulations and compliance.
But there are added requirements, such as the ability to understand cryptographic technologies and “an insatiable drive to work at the bleeding edge of new, booming industry.”
GCs who work in crypto are navigating an oddly regulated space—often, crypto companies aim to comply with laws that weren't originally designed for virtual currency.
As the district0x's posting says, “You will face questions no one has answered and challenges no one has solved. It's no longer enough for us to stay abreast of the trends in the legal world. We want to set them.”
Crypto payment for legal work may be relatively new in the in-house sphere, but some outside counsel, including Perkins Coie and Frost Brown Todd, have accepted bitcoin payments already, in some cases as early as 2013.
Firms lawyers told Legaltech News in January that getting payments in bitcoin has its perks—it's fast, anonymous and opens up the client pool—but it can also be unpredictable.
“Lawyers are typically very risk adverse and tend to be on the side of certainty, so I think that's probably one of the biggest issues for them in accepting bitcoin as a fee,” Carol Van Cleef, a Washington, D.C. lawyer who does crypto work, told Legaltech in January. “How do you price it? When do you price it? How do you ensure you're minimizing any downside risk in a volatile trading market?”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoogle Fails to Secure Long-Term Stay of Order Requiring It to Open App Store to Rivals
'Am I Spending Time in the Right Place?' SPX Technologies CLO Cherée Johnson on Living and Leading With Intent
9 minute read'It Was the Next Graduation': How an In-House Lawyer Became a Serial Entrepreneur
9 minute readRenee Meisel, GC of UnitedLex, on Understanding and Growing the Business
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250