How to Survive a Move In-House: Tips From a Lawyer Who's Been There
William Kruse of Gallup quite literally wrote the book on how to navigate the transition from firm to law department. He explained to Corporate Counsel why crashing meetings and breaking things are two of the best ways to make the adjustment successfully.
August 30, 2018 at 12:20 PM
7 minute read
The transition from firm life to an in-house role can be a time of confusion.
But William Kruse is here to help. The author of “The Corporate Counsel Survival Guide,” a new book, has worked in-house at Gallup Inc. for more than seven years and serves as the global management consulting company's regulatory compliance officer and vice president, law and counsel.
Kruse speaks and writes from experience. He came to Gallup from law firm Holland, Groves, Schneller & Stolze. It was his first in-house role, and the transition process was full of questions.
Corporate Counsel spoke with Kruse about his new book, which hits Amazon in February 2019 and is already available via the American Bar Association. The Gallup attorney also shared his practical advice for lawyers making the transition he once navigated. This interview has been edited for clarity and length.
Corporate Counsel: What inspired “The Corporate Counsel Survival Guide”?
William Kruse: A few things. One was my own transition in-house. You leave a law firm and you come into an in-house position and it's very different. Then, a couple years into practice in-house at Gallup, an outside counsel friend decided she was going to take an in-house counsel position. She started peppering me with the same questions I had when I moved in-house and we joked about there not being a survival guide for this transition. And then I joked I would write one.
The general counsel, Steven O'Brien, at Gallup has published four novels, it's a hobby of his, and my wife has always said I should also write a book. Between the goading of my wife, the inspiration of my boss and the joking of my friend going in-house, they pushed me onto this precipice. I'm also pretty active in my bar organization and they're always looking for authors. It was one of those moments where you accidentally raise your hand and say 'Yeah sure, I'll do it.' They approached me, I said sure, and then I was on the hook. It was a great experience.
How did you balance writing with the demands of an in-house job?
I carried around a notebook and I jotted down any idea, whether it turned out to be nothing or a total gem. Something would hit me and I'd take a minute to write one or two sentences of the thought, so I wouldn't forget it later.
When it came time to write, I do a lot of long haul flights for Gallup, and there are times where I might be traveling for 14 or 36 hours at a time. It can be very hard to work on some of those flights, but it's easy to write. So I would open my notebook, check off two or three of the topics, and just write. Similarly, at night if I got all my work done and was relaxing, instead of channel surfing I would look at my notebook and pick one of the topics that was interesting for me and write on it.
What's one piece of advice you have for in-house lawyers starting out?
Be careful in the first 100 days. There are a lot of things that, when you move to being in-house counsel, you're not prepared for in those first three months. You don't know a lot about how a company operates, who the players are, the issues that are hot and ongoing, the internal struggles between departments that you're immediately going to get thrust into.
The gut reaction for a lot of us, in our confidence, is to walk in and immediately start trying to help. We feel like we know what is going on and want to immediately take action, but that can be a mistake. Sometimes it's good to hold off and get a lay of the land. Take it all in and learn what is best for your ultimate client, the company.
How do you get a lay of the land?
Two things: Crash as many meetings as you can, even if you're not invited. And don't be afraid to break things.
When it comes to the meetings, it can be a little off-putting at first. But if people know you're there to help and not to tell them “no,” and you just show up, introduce yourself and say you are there to figure out what's going on in the company, you're gaining huge insights into everything. That's how you get real understanding of what's going on—not sitting in your office. You will not learn anything sitting in your office with your door closed.
With “don't be afraid to break things”—as new in-house counsel, there can be a hesitancy to do some things or make some calls. Find a senior in-house counsel who you trust and who trusts you, and say, “I'm going to make some calls, I'm going to go experiment and look into things I can help fix.”
And if you feel like you've broken something, be honest enough to come to the senior counsel above you and say what you did. Have trust in that senior counsel to take the reins and put things back together. There are very few things in a company that can't be fixed as long as there is trust, honesty and communication in the legal team.
Did you speak with other in-house lawyers for the book, or is it based off of your own experience?
A lot of it is my own experience, but there are also words of wisdom passed on by my boss, who has spent 25 years as in-house counsel, and things from after-work discussions with my friends and colleagues.
I had been chairing the corporate counsel committee for the ABA tort trial and insurance practice section, and had a great opportunity to be surrounded by great corporate counsel who would pass along great information, great wisdom, stories, things they had seen. A lot of those made it into the book as well.
What are some of the biggest changes and challenges lawyers face when they move in-house?
Some of it is not understanding the difference in your role. When you are outside counsel, there's always a new client, new issue or a big issue for the same client. You get a certain satisfaction out of solving problems, and the bigger the problem, the bigger the resolution.
You need a certain level of challenge arising in order to feel job satisfaction and to feel engaged as outside counsel. When you go in-house, those feelings are in conflict, because what you really want is no problems for your client. Your ultimate goal for the client is: everything is going smoothly, there are no investigations, no employment law problems, every deal goes smoothly.
One chapter is called “The Biggest Challenge May Be a Year Without a Crisis,” and that's because you start to feel you aren't needed. You have to find a way to learn, grow as a professional, stay relevant, help the company and find things that are challenging to you professionally, but also are in the best interest of the company. The company can't always be facing critical issues that you're going to save the day on, or the company is not in a good place.
That's hard for an outside counsel who is used to being the star of the show. When you move in-house, it's not all about the lawyer. You become the support system, and that's an interesting transition for people.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPeople and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
7 minute readFrom Olympic Aspirations to Legal Innovation: Tom Dunlop's Journey to Founding Summize
8 minute read'Am I Spending Time in the Right Place?' SPX Technologies CLO Cherée Johnson on Living and Leading With Intent
9 minute readMary O'Carroll on Her Move to Goodwin: Law Firms Are at the Heart of Industry Disruption
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250