Money Talks: Using Severance Agreements to Seal the Deal
Severance agreements are a powerful bargaining tool for both sides, and it's critical for companies and candidates alike to understand how and when to deploy it.
August 30, 2018 at 03:20 PM
5 minute read
Etiquette might suggest that when accepting a job offer, negotiating what happens if it doesn't work out is bad form. As top talent—and, in many cases, HR departments—in a growing range of industries come to understand the strategic and practical value of severance agreements, that attitude is changing.
A severance agreement provides compensation to an employee for a period of time after the employee is terminated. Severance is only triggered if a company terminates the employee without fault, meaning electing to leave as a result of a management change or poor company performance would not trigger severance, and neither would fireable offenses like violating company policy. Most industries do not regularly use severance agreements, particularly at the offer stage of a hiring process. However, this underutilized tool can be a useful part of negotiations to address risks or concerns an employee may have about an otherwise appealing opportunity.
For employers, a severance agreement helps attract top talent to positions that could have a short shelf life. For employees, it mitigates the risk associated with taking a job that could end for reasons unrelated to work performance. It's a powerful bargaining tool for both sides, and it's critical for companies and candidates alike to understand how and when to deploy it.
Pre-hire: When is severance appropriate?
Severance agreements can be negotiated both for new hires and existing employees making lateral moves within a company. Generally, the more external factors that may impact the longevity of tenure, the more value a severance agreement can provide. Severance agreements can be used if there is potential for change in control of the company, such as an impending CEO change or a spin-off/merger during which certain positions could become redundant. They are more popular in fast-moving industries, such as media and entertainment, where these changes happen frequently.
Regardless of the risk level, pre-hire severance agreements are typically reserved for high-level candidates, as these candidates can be harder for companies to find.
Upon termination: Who gets severance?
If severance wasn't discussed pre-hire, there may be another opportunity to negotiate it upon termination, but only when the employee is terminated for reasons other than cause. Companies occasionally offer it—or an employee can make a good case for getting it—if the termination is a direct result of poor company performance or an acquisition in which positions became redundant. However, as with pre-hire agreements, the opportunity for severance depends on an employee's level of seniority and length of tenure with the company.
What's in a severance package?
The terms of a severance agreement, just like any contract, are highly negotiable though there are general norms. Pre-hire severance agreements generally provide employees between six and 12 months of total cash compensation. However, recently, we have seen candidates ask for—and receive—up to two years of severance in limited circumstances. Companies may also sweeten the agreement by offering accelerated vesting of an equity component of the contract. General counsels can seek similar severance terms to other members of the C-suite or similarly situated executives.
There is far less flexibility for negotiation following termination. While the length of tenure and circumstances of termination can impact the severance package, the general formula is one month of severance for each year of service with the company.
Negotiating Severance
When possible, candidates in the running for higher-risk positions should attempt to negotiate a severance agreement as part of their offer of employment. This provides a degree of certainty to both the employee and the employer of what can be expected upon termination for reasons outlined in the severance agreement. It also provides both parties the ability to define the terms of severance—including what circumstances would trigger severance and how much severance would be provided—in a more neutral context. Though it may seem like proving oneself in the job first could make an employer more amenable to offering a good package, the fact is that employees are at the mercy of the company after accepting a job offer.
Employers should consider proactively offering severance packages as a way to attract the very best talent to positions that could change rapidly. They show foresight and a commitment to employees that candidates value. An upfront severance offer is also a strategic move since the terms of the agreement almost always favor the company itself; the employee can't trigger severance without the company deciding that termination is the right course of action.
A severance agreement need not be a part of every job offer extended. However, understanding the value that severance agreements can provide to both employers and potential employees in specific circumstances can help bring a successful close to what could otherwise be a tricky hiring process.
Brandy Russell is a managing director in the in-house practice group of Major, Lindsey & Africa.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Blisters Skilled Care Home Chain That Terminated Nursing Assistant Who Complained About Wages
6 minute readPreparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
Employers Race to File NLRB Petitions to Gain Upper Hand in Union Organizing
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Appears Sympathetic to Law Requiring Porn Sites to Verify Users' Age
- 2Cybersecurity Breaches, Cyberbullying, and Ways to Help Protect Clients From Both
- 3AI in 2025: Five Key Predictions on How It Will Reshape International Law Firms
- 4Justice Known for Asking 'Tough Questions' Resolves to Improve Civility
- 5Robinson & Cole Elects New Partners and Counsel
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250