How to Avoid a Corporate Board Battle: Lessons From Moonves and Redstone
Corporate Counsel spoke with corporate governance experts about some of the lessons to be learned from the fallout between Shari Redstone, president of CBS's controlling shareholder, and the company's departed CEO Leslie Moonves.
September 13, 2018 at 03:44 PM
4 minute read
Last weekend marked not only the end of Leslie Moonves' illustrious career as the top executive at CBS Corp., but it also brought about a detente in a longstanding corporate power struggle.
For the past several months, Shari Redstone, president of CBS's controlling shareholder National Amusements Inc., has fought for control of CBS. The battle included a lawsuit against Redstone filed by the New York-based media giant, vehement disagreement over the company's future and #MeToo allegations against Moonves.
Corporate Counsel spoke with corporate governance experts about some of the lessons to be learned from the fallout of the Redstone-Moonves war.
Appeal to an Independent Director
At the heart of the feud between Redstone and Moonves was the former's desire to merge with Viacom Inc., a move Moonves opposed.
Last May, CBS and five directors sued Redstone and National Amusements, a privately held theater chain company. The suit aimed to end the Redstone family's controlling influence over CBS and block the merger with Viacom–though National Amusements had previously said it would only support the merger if the transaction had buy-in from both sides.
The truce reached this past Sunday night called not only for Moonves' departure but also for the appointment of six new board members. According to the Los Angeles Times, Redstone was involved in choosing this new crop of directors.
“The real question is, 'Was there a point prior to the filing of the lawsuit that an independent director could have stepped in to negotiate?'” said Cornell Law professor Charles Whitehead.
The fallout may have been mitigated, Whitehead said, had an independent director acting on behalf of the shareholders' interests respectfully intervened to try to get the parties on the same page. (An independent director is a board member with no material relationship to the company.)
Eliminate Dual-Class Stock
National Amusements owns 80 percent of the voting stock of CBS and Viacom but only 10 percent of the economic interest—a dual-class stock structure that allowed Redstone to undermine CBS's management, the company argued in its suit.
Charles Elson, director of the University of Delaware's Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance, said this structure turned out to be a “petri dish” for conflict at the network.
“This whole situation arose because of the disparity between economic interests and voting interests,” he said. “The board was caught between two forces, and this is the result. They couldn't function like a normally acting board because due to that structure, they were stuck between one master, Redstone, and the CEO.”
Fully Disclose the Fundamentals
As if an existential disagreement over the future of the company weren't contentious enough, rumors that Moonves sexually assaulted or harassed multiple women began to surface last January, six months before the bombshell New Yorker article that detailed these accusations was published, according to a Wall Street Journal report.
Also in January, the Journal reported, Moonves disclosed to members of CBS's nomination and governance committee, but not to all directors, the existence of a sexual assault complaint that had been filed against him with the Los Angeles Police Department stemming from an alleged incident in the 1980s.
This information, however, should have been shared with the entire board, Whitehead said. While he acknowledges that Moonves and perhaps some of his board allies may have been operating under a “siege mentality” and did not want the information to fall into Redstone's hands, “the full board should have known.”
“What's worse than deliberately slighting someone? The perception of deliberately slighting someone,” Whitehead said of Moonves' limited disclosure. “Because this is so fundamental, the right decision would have been to disclose it to the entire board.”
The story has been updated to clarify National Amusements' position on the proposed Viacom-CBS merger.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGlobal Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Meta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Ad Agency Legal Chief Scores $12M Golden Parachute in $13B Sale to Rival
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Treasury GC Returns to Davis Polk to Co-Chair White-Collar Defense and Investigations Practice
- 2Decision of the Day: JFK to Paris Stowaway's Bail Revocation Explained
- 3Doug Emhoff, Husband of Former VP Harris, Lands at Willkie
- 4LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 5Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250