Ex-Cushman & Wakefield Executive Sues Firm Over Race, Gender Claims
“The evidence we have points to an environment where white men are favored by their male colleagues in senior management, significantly limiting the advancement of women, and particularly women of color,” a lawyer for the former Cushman & Wakefield executive, Nicole Urquhart-Bradley, said.
September 25, 2018 at 01:28 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A former Cushman & Wakefield executive who said the global real estate company used her as a face of workplace diversity sued the company in Washington federal court on Tuesday for alleged race and gender discrimination, claiming persistent roadblocks and unequal treatment.
The complaint was filed by Nicole Urquhart-Bradley, the former head of valuation and advisory for the Americas. Urquhart-Bradley, an African-American female executive who had worked at Cushman & Wakefield for more than a decade, was terminated in January.
Urquhart-Bradley's complaint, filed by the plaintiffs firm Sanford Heisler Sharp, alleged a culture of discrimination at the company, where women and minorities allegedly faced more roadblocks than white males. The complaint said that despite above-average performance reviews, Urquhart-Bradley was terminated because of her race and gender.
“The evidence we have points to an environment where white men are favored by their male colleagues in senior management, significantly limiting the advancement of women, and particularly women of color,” Deborah Marcuse, lead counsel for Urquhart-Bradley, said in a statement. “The irony is that Cushman & Wakefield was holding out Ms. Urquhart-Bradley as evidence of its diversity right up until it wrongfully terminated her.”
Cushman & Wakefield is represented by Mary Dollarhide, a DLA Piper partner in San Diego. Dollarhide was not immediately reached for comment Tuesday, and neither was a spokesperson for Cushman & Wakefield.
Nicole Urquhart-Bradley.Urquhart-Bradley was promoted in 2016, but she did not receive her predecessor's title of president of global valuation and advisory. The complaint said Urquhart-Bradley instead was given the “lesser title of president of valuation and advisory Americas.” The lawsuit alleged Urquhart-Bradley was one of the two remaining female service-line leaders at Cushman & Wakefield when she was fired this year.
Urquhart-Bradley claimed she successfully fended off a mass poaching attempt by her previous boss's new firm. Cushman & Wakefield offered six-to-seven-figure bonuses to top-performing team members to get them to decline competing offers. She also helped the firm exceed its revenue plan for the year and surpassing the previous year. In 2017, she was named in BisNow's “Women of Influence in Commercial Real Estate.”
Her lawsuit claimed she was treated differently when she discussed a competing offer from another real estate firm that wanted to hire her. Urquhart-Bradley said she did not ask for a retention bonus, but, rather, a contract renegotiation. By comparison, she alleged in her lawsuit, her predecessor was offered $3 million to stay. The company, according to the lawsuit, used Urquhart-Bradley's competing offer as the root of her termination.
“She wasn't asking for money at that time. She asked for modest protections in her contract that high-level executives regularly request,” Marcuse said in an interview Tuesday. “Clearly, the CEO was outraged. The question that we face is why there was a profound difference in reaction to a high-level African-American woman who doesn't actually threaten to leave and her male counterparts.”
The lawsuit claimed Urquhart-Bradley's termination followed years of hostile treatment by executives, including fighting to keep her from promotions she had earned. She was accused of being “defensive” and that “if she wanted to be 'taken seriously' she needed to 'stop whining' and 'get with the program.'”
“Urquhart-Bradley became accustomed to playing the role of ambassador for 'diversity' at C&W, which regularly deployed her to project a public image that was at odds with a deeply entrenched culture of discrimination against women and people of color,” according to the lawsuit.
Marcuse said the #MeToo movement has drawn attention to sexual harassment in the workplace, but gender discrimination is still pervasive across professional industries.
“The disrespect that women at the highest levels still face is oppressive and depressing,” she said. “Insults at comments directed at her and other women in that situation reflects the deeply entrenched culture which is oppressive for the few people who are women and people of color who manage to somehow prosper to rise to the level she did in that culture.”
Urquhart-Bradley's complaint is posted below:
Read more:
➤➤ Get employment law news and commentary straight to your in-box with Labor of Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStep 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Jenner & Block Energy Practice Leader Joins Renewable-Power Giant Constellation as GC
Embracing Gen AI, Many Legal Departments Don't See Their Firms as Innovative
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 2'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 3FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
- 4California Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
- 5Law Student Sues NY Attorney Grievance Officials, Seeking Materials Over Sexual Assault Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250