How Eaton Built Deeper Relationships With Outside Counsel
As part of a strategy revamp, the company reduced its sprawling roster of 185 law firms and developed stronger ties to those that remain.
October 01, 2018 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
Eaton Corp. general counsel Heath Monesmith started revamping his outside counsel strategy about two years ago, when the legal department was trying to deal with a sprawling inventory of 185 law firms.
Monesmith wanted to build deeper, more trusting relationships with outside counsel. “And you can only do that with a few firms,” he says. “It's not practical to try and do it with a large number.” Eaton is a power management corporation registered in Ireland, but with operations based in Cleveland. It has over 96,000 employees doing business in more than 175 countries.
Monesmith says a strategic committee initiated the outside counsel selection process and “ran point,” but the entire team of 51 lawyers worldwide took part in the choices. “We took a hard look at how we retain outside counsel, and sought to hire and retain counsel who embrace Eaton's values,” Monesmith says. “We want to think of our outside counsel as an extension of the internal team and hold them to the same standards—exceptional lawyers who are efficient, cost conscious, strategic, innovative and practical.”
While the project looked at all outside counsel, the strategy focused on 108 U.S. litigation firms. “Litigation happens to be one of our cost drivers,” Monesmith explains. “If you have a select group of litigation counsel, you can leverage that relationship into other areas.” The GC says the in-house team “purposely didn't set objective targets of reducing to a certain number of law firms. The result was simply a natural byproduct of our selection process.” Eaton went from 108 outside litigation law firms to 25, and reduced its legal costs by 11 percent year over year.
Monesmith declined to identify any firms in this pared down group that stood out above the rest. “I trust all 25 of them to handle our litigation matters,” he says. “On any day, any one of them could be in the top three. It just depends on the region, the issue and the expertise required that day.”
On billing, the GC says Eaton uses “a full suite of options” for outside counsel, including alternative fee arrangements. “But there are times when billable hour makes more sense, if internal and external lawyers are on [the] same page regarding budgets and expectations,” he adds. The legal department will sometimes use fixed fees for some work and for appeals, while insisting on volume discounts when using billable hours.
“We also use our technology to track for annual budgets and life-of-matter budgets,” he says. “And we use specialized tracking forms for bigger matters.”
To form deeper relationships, Monesmith says Eaton brings in each strategic counsel at a law firm for regular structured feedback conferences. “These are not meetings about the legal matter of the day,” he explains. “These are broader meetings about evaluating performance.”
“We talk with them much like a leader would with an employee,” he says. “We discuss the level of the service they have provided, where things went well, where things didn't go as well.” And it's a two-way street, as Eaton's legal department seeks to hear from firms in return. Monesmith says, “Our own teams report where we think we could have done better in our relationships with outside counsel, and ask for their feedback on that.”
He says his team also examines the law firm's business model, and asks how the firm is innovating, how it is training associates, and what its latest diversity and inclusion initiatives are. The bottom line: “Those meetings are really about building trust with a key strategic supplier. That feedback loop in turn drives higher levels of performance,” Monesmith says.
For its part, Eaton has launched a “backstage pass program” that allows diverse lawyers at its outside firms to visit the company several times a year and to meet with company leaders to better understand Eaton's business imperatives.
The legal team's hard work hasn't gone unrecognized. Its outside counsel strategy revamp earned it an Association of Corporate Counsel Value Champions Award for 2018.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
The Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
2 minute readEx-Marathon General Counsel Takes Legal Reins of Another Energy Company
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250