California's New Board Quota Law Could Move the Needle on Diversity
A bill signed into law this week by Gov. Jerry Brown has made gender diversity on company boards not just a moral issue, but a legal one for companies in California.
October 02, 2018 at 02:34 PM
3 minute read
A bill signed into law this week by Gov. Jerry Brown has made gender diversity on company boards not just a moral issue, but a legal one for companies in California.
Companies headquartered in the Golden State will need to have at least one woman on their board by 2019. Larger boards will be required to have more women, two out of five or three out of seven directors, and be given until 2021 to comply.
California's Senate Bill No. 826 comes a year into the #MeToo movement, which has prompted discussions on workplace gender equity. It's the first time a U.S. state has set a quota for women on boards, a rather controversial approach to boosting diversity.
Susan Keating, the chief executive officer of WomenCorporateDirectors, an international organization of women on boards that works to increase diversity, said that even among her group, there are differing views on gender quotas.
“We have members that are in California who not only supported the bill but were engaged in writing the legislation, and we have other members that ardently stand for deregulation,” Keating said.
She said WCD has focused on increasing the pipeline of diverse candidates rather than quotas. That's in part because California's mandate is the first of its kind in the U.S.
But California is far from the first jurisdiction globally to have a gender quota for boards. For a decade Norway has required corporate boards to be at least 40 percent women. Italy, France and other European countries have similar quotas, which have upped the number of women on boards. However, the board quotas did not seem to move the needle for women in other gender equity areas.
The Economist reported that in the decade since Norway's quota went into place, fears of unqualified women being appointed to boards mostly did not come to fruition and that qualified women were not stretched any thinner than their male counterparts.
In California, as in European countries with board quotas, companies that don't comply will be fined. For companies in California, the fine is $100,000 on first offense and $300,000 for subsequent violations.
Olga Mack, the vice president of Quantstamp Inc., founder of Women Serve On Boards and a longtime in-house lawyer, said she believes having the quota as law will bring gender equity sooner.
“When it's illegal not to find women they tend to be found,” Mack said.
Mack advocated for the bill. She said that, because the number of women required increases by board size, there should not be a single token female board member, a concern of some quota critics.
Without regulation, women may still find a place in leadership—but that could take a century, Mack said, and the new law will help bring equity now.
“It's predicted for us to reach parity on corporate boards it will [take] 40 to 100 years, so it will not happen during my lifetime and not during my daughters' lifetime,” Mack said. “So I'm convinced we should be doing something on a policy front to change it in our lifetime, because one lifetime or two lifetimes is a long time to wait.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorney Gives Up 25-Year Law Firm Career to Become CLO of Seattle's Pro Soccer Teams
Kristin Coleman Out as GC of Albemarle Amid Leadership Reshuffle
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250