Kaepernick's Trademark Application for Face, Hair Is 'Ambitious,' IP Lawyer Says
The application filed by Bruce H. Bernstein, a co-managing partner at Greenblum & Bernstein, includes nearly a score of classes of products and services.
October 12, 2018 at 03:39 PM
4 minute read
Colin Kaepernick, the former quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers and the face of Nike's current advertising campaign, applied to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office last week seeking trademark rights to a black-and-white image of his face and hair.
The application, which was first reported by ESPN, includes 17 classes of products and services that range from lotion and jewelry to self-empowerment classes.
Kaepernick is represented by Bruce H. Bernstein, a co-managing partner at Greenblum & Bernstein in Reston, Virginia. Bernstein declined to comment Friday. Kaepernick's business manager's assistant also declined to comment.
“It's a pretty ambitious application,” said Michael P. Cohen, the founder and principal of Cohen IP Law Group. “You typically don't see 17 classes.”
Cohen explained that once Kaepernick is granted preliminary approval, he will have to go back to the USPTO showing that he is using each of the products in commerce before the trademark is granted final approval.
Eric Perrott, a trademark and copyright attorney at Gerben Law Firm in Washington, D.C., said the trademark filing shows that Kaepernick is taking action on his movement. Part of the application indicates that he intends to use the image to promote a variety of classes, including one that teaches people how to interact with law enforcement.
While other athletes have certainly trademarked their images before, none, as far as Cohen could find, has applied to have a trademark of their image linked to their political beliefs.
Aside from its civic motives, the trademark would allow Kaepernick to license his image.
“He might not produce a brand of lotions, but he might have a partnership where he licenses the image to him,” Perrott explained. “He would still maintain protection over it.”
That protection goes a long way. Tennis player Roger Federer ended up losing the “RF” logo with which he was associated when he left Nike to join the Japanese brand Uniqlo, because Nike owned the RF logo.
If the application is approved and Kaepernick licenses the image to Nike, he would retain the image if he chose to go to a different company.
“If they [athletes] can own all of those things, it is a huge win because they can use it in the future,” Perrott said.
Perrott also said the trademark would provide protection for Kaepernick's black-and-white image if someone wants to use it to put on a shirt mocking him and his political beliefs.
“If an opponent to his movement wanted to use the image of his face on a consumer product as a joke, he would be in a position to get them to stop,” Perrott explained.
Cohen said that in another scenario, where someone uses only part of the image on a product, Kaepernick would have legal recourse depending on the facts of the case because of the trademark.
This all is if the trademark gets approved. The application was filed on Oct. 5 and Cohen said that it can take the USPTO four to six months before a preliminary approval is granted.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1$83M Verdict After $100K Demand Rejected in Henry County
- 2Samsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
- 3How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 4On the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
- 5Review of Ex-parte orders by the Appellate Division
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250