Ghoulish Chocolate Scorecard Ratings Emphasize Need for Supply Chain Scrutiny
It's not just chocolate and candy companies that should be aware of potential problems, from human trafficking to so-called land grabbing from indigenous people, that may lurk in their global supply chains.
October 23, 2018 at 02:11 PM
3 minute read
Are you planning on handing out M&Ms, Snickers or Twix this Halloween? If so, there's a chance the sweet goodies were made by child laborers halfway around the world, according to a nonprofit organization that rates major candy companies on social and environmental practices.
Although Mars Inc., the maker of these chocolate candies, received a C+ on Green America's chocolate scorecard, the company has implemented programs to address other underlying issues of child labor, the report notes. For years the major global chocolate companies have faced criticism, including litigation, for their use of child labor in Cote d'Ivoire and Ghana, where most of the world's cocoa is produced.
But it's not just chocolate and candy companies that should be aware of potential problems, from human trafficking to so-called “land grabbing” from indigenous people, that may lurk in their global supply chains, said Sarah Rathke, a partner at Squire Patton Boggs.
“Any company that makes things is, on some level, taking something out of the earth, often in far-flung places,” she said.
Rathke and Matthew Kirk, international affairs adviser at the firm, said that adopting a policy of “aggressive transparency” can be an effective way to learn about and stop these issues in the supply chain. But it may be a hard sell for the business side, since aggressive transparency involves taking a hard look at your supply chain practices and, when feasible, disclosing what you have found, even if harmful.
“You have to frame and approach things very deliberately because so often when companies get in trouble, it's because they've tried to conceal” the problem, Rathke said.
But once you've done the internal digging and confronted the potentially damaging side of your practices, you can start articulating benchmarks that will lead to improvement, added Kirk, who was a former external affairs director at Vodafone, where he was tasked with defending the British telecommunications company against reputational harm.
“There are very powerful tools to help you gradually move away from business models that look damaging without having major disruptions in service,” he said.
Companies also should consider working closely with nongovernmental organizations that monitor these practices, Kirk said. Not only does working with serious groups challenge you to further improve your practices, but it also serves as a “fantastic defense” should you face the firestorm of media and other scrutiny, he added.
“Responsible corporations should not fear working hand-in-hand with NGOs and being allies in the efforts,” Rathke agreed.
Corporate Counsel reached out to Mars for comments or a statement about its scorecard rating but did not hear back by deadline.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMLB's Texas Rangers Search for a New GC and a Broadcasting Deal
Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
3 minute readFTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250