Patent Trolls Threats Are Not From a 'Fairy Tale,' Says High Tech Inventors Alliance's GC
High Tech Inventors Alliance GC John Thorne issued a statement on the importance of fighting patent trolls, after the director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office compared patent trolls to fictional villains causing unnecessary fear.
October 23, 2018 at 06:24 PM
3 minute read
Patent trolls are not fictional monsters—they're real inhibitors to American innovation, according to a statement from the general counsel of the High Tech Inventors Alliance, whose members include Google, Amazon.com Inc. and Salesforce.com Inc.
HTIA's GC John Thorne issued his statement Tuesday in response to a recent speech from director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Andrei Iancu.
The director, who took office in February, compared patent trolls to the Big Bad Wolf from ”Little Red Riding Hood,” and said companies intent on discussing them are dissuading innovation by scaring potential creators away.
“After hearing about the Big Bad Wolf eating Little Red Riding Hood and her grandma, would kids be more eager to go into the woods and more eager to take risks? Come on!” Iancu said, according to his posted remarks at the Eastern District of Texas Bar Association Inaugural Texas Dinner earlier this month.
Thorne said he understood the draw of telling scary stories around Halloween, but that patent trolls are real-life monsters, and should be taken seriously. He said in his statement that nonpracticing entities with low-quality patents account for 90 percent of patent litigation around high-tech products and services.
“It's not a fairy tale. The phrase 'patent troll' is a phrase used by all the leadership in Congress, and both the Senate and House side. It's a shorthand. But it's a real problem,” Thorne told Corporate Counsel Tuesday.
Patent trolls can deter tech company investment into research and development, he said, adding that Congress helped alleviate this problem in 2012, when it created the inter partes review process through the America Invents Act. Since then U.S. companies have increased R&D investment by almost $200 billion per year, he said.
Thorne added that the Eastern District of Texas, where Iancu spoke, has been a notorious patent troll hot spot. If American tech companies are to continue investing in innovation, Thorne said it's important to improve patent control, something he said Iancu had also expressed in their previous discussions together.
“One of his priorities properly is to improve patent quality, and I believe the director understands that there are two opportunities to do that. One is at the outset. You want to issue only good patents, patents that [you] should issue, and at back end, if a patent got out the door,” he said.
Throne added that Iancu's speech in Texas provides a chance to discuss the role patent trolls can play in disincentiving R&D investment from tech companies, including HTIA's members Adobe, Amazon, Cisco, Dell, Google, Intel, Oracle and Salesforce.
“It's important to take an opportunity like this to emphasize why patent quality matters and that's an important focus for the patent office, and I would expect that to be a very large focus for the patent office,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?
- 2Trending Issues in Florida Construction Law That Attorneys Need to Be Aware Of
- 3The Importance of Judicial Elections
- 4Ephemeral Messaging Going Into 2025:The Messages May Vanish But Not The Preservation Obligations
- 5Decision of the Day: Trial Court's Sidestep of 'Batson' Deprived Defendant of Challenge to Jury Discrimination
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250