Patent Trolls Threats Are Not From a 'Fairy Tale,' Says High Tech Inventors Alliance's GC
High Tech Inventors Alliance GC John Thorne issued a statement on the importance of fighting patent trolls, after the director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office compared patent trolls to fictional villains causing unnecessary fear.
October 23, 2018 at 06:24 PM
3 minute read
Patent trolls are not fictional monsters—they're real inhibitors to American innovation, according to a statement from the general counsel of the High Tech Inventors Alliance, whose members include Google, Amazon.com Inc. and Salesforce.com Inc.
HTIA's GC John Thorne issued his statement Tuesday in response to a recent speech from director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Andrei Iancu.
The director, who took office in February, compared patent trolls to the Big Bad Wolf from ”Little Red Riding Hood,” and said companies intent on discussing them are dissuading innovation by scaring potential creators away.
“After hearing about the Big Bad Wolf eating Little Red Riding Hood and her grandma, would kids be more eager to go into the woods and more eager to take risks? Come on!” Iancu said, according to his posted remarks at the Eastern District of Texas Bar Association Inaugural Texas Dinner earlier this month.
Thorne said he understood the draw of telling scary stories around Halloween, but that patent trolls are real-life monsters, and should be taken seriously. He said in his statement that nonpracticing entities with low-quality patents account for 90 percent of patent litigation around high-tech products and services.
“It's not a fairy tale. The phrase 'patent troll' is a phrase used by all the leadership in Congress, and both the Senate and House side. It's a shorthand. But it's a real problem,” Thorne told Corporate Counsel Tuesday.
Patent trolls can deter tech company investment into research and development, he said, adding that Congress helped alleviate this problem in 2012, when it created the inter partes review process through the America Invents Act. Since then U.S. companies have increased R&D investment by almost $200 billion per year, he said.
Thorne added that the Eastern District of Texas, where Iancu spoke, has been a notorious patent troll hot spot. If American tech companies are to continue investing in innovation, Thorne said it's important to improve patent control, something he said Iancu had also expressed in their previous discussions together.
“One of his priorities properly is to improve patent quality, and I believe the director understands that there are two opportunities to do that. One is at the outset. You want to issue only good patents, patents that [you] should issue, and at back end, if a patent got out the door,” he said.
Throne added that Iancu's speech in Texas provides a chance to discuss the role patent trolls can play in disincentiving R&D investment from tech companies, including HTIA's members Adobe, Amazon, Cisco, Dell, Google, Intel, Oracle and Salesforce.
“It's important to take an opportunity like this to emphasize why patent quality matters and that's an important focus for the patent office, and I would expect that to be a very large focus for the patent office,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
InCloudCounsel Hires First GC to Continue Expansion in Asia
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250