The Business Benefits of a Strong Ethical Culture
There's never a convenient time to relax and stop talking about how valuable a robust ethics and compliance function is to an organization. With fall budget planning in full swing, now is a good time to consider some of the many business benefits of a strong ethical culture.
October 24, 2018 at 10:55 AM
4 minute read
There's never a convenient time to relax and stop talking about how valuable a robust ethics and compliance function is to an organization. With fall budget planning in full swing, now is a good time to consider some of the many business benefits of a strong ethical culture.
|Reducing Instances
The “work” of compliance is reduced when a culture of strong ethics is in place. If employees have a deep appreciation of how the company defines ethical behavior and how it wants them to behave, organizations will have fewer instances of misconduct that trigger investigations, regulatory disclosures or internal control audits.
The words deep appreciation in the above sentence are deliberate. They are not the same as clear understanding. A company can always state its ethical principles clearly, and employees can always then disregard those principles anyway. Employees need to embrace those principles in their daily conduct. That's what turns ethical culture into a preventative measure, which reduces the corrective actions a compliance function might need to take.
|Broadcasting Company Values
It's also easier to handle hard times if the company culture is strong. Misconduct and mistakes will still happen at the company. Those negative reputation events can come quickly, cause enormous disruption and might not even be accurate portrayals of what actually happened. That's life in this highly regulated, highly polarized, highly interdependent world.
The disruption such events bring is lessened in companies with a strong ethical culture because the culture acts as a unitive force that conveys the company's true essence, regardless of the actions of one or two outliers. It's something all stakeholders, inside the organization and out, can see.
Consider this scenario: one local manager retaliates against a whistleblower, and documentation of that abuse is spread across the internet for all eternity. A strong culture can mean the difference between the public thinking, “That person is a jerk” or “The whole company must be like that.”
|Winning Regulatory Favor
Regulators, particularly in the banking sector, now talk about the importance of a strong culture constantly. That attention to culture could take the form of thoughtful incentive compensation plans (ones that discourage excessive risk-taking) or a clear determination to hold employees accountable for personal misconduct. A strong culture wins favor with regulators.
The Justice Department announced the FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy last year, and that spirit of taking ethical conduct seriously is behind it. To win full credit under the policy, a company with FCPA issues must voluntarily disclose trouble; cooperate fully with regulators; and remediate the underlying policy or control weaknesses. A company cannot easily (or cheaply) hit those marks without a serious commitment to good conduct—that is, a strong culture of compliance.
|Enabling a Risk-Assured Manner
Just as a strong culture reduces instances, it also enables companies to execute business processes in a risk-assured manner. In organizations with a strong culture, where employees know what they're allowed to do and how to do it, they can go about their jobs more quickly and efficiently. Ultimately, that brings a strategic advantage over competitors.
A company that takes due diligence of third parties seriously, for instance, might not onboard new business partners more quickly, but those relationships are likely to be more stable over time. That will alleviate the organization's challenge of finding reliable business partners and allow the company to focus more on putting those relationships to full work.
In the same vein, a comprehensive training program for new employees about acceptable conduct won't accelerate the hiring process, but it will allow those employees to accelerate all the other work they do after they're on board—because organizations will have less risk of personal misconduct catching them by surprise, forcing them to fire that high-performing star who just made inappropriate contact with an intern.
|Worth the Work
Creating an environment of strong corporate ethics can be compared to exercise. It's a daily and long-term commitment, and results are not visible right away. Companies do it because they know it's the right thing to do, not because it feels good or is easy. And in the long run, they see the benefits in multiple ways. Building a strong corporate culture requires this kind of consistent, hard work, but by doing so, ethical behavior becomes second nature, easing regulatory concerns and improving employee efficiency.
Valerie Charles serves as chief strategy officer for GAN Integrity. She has served as outside counsel, conducted internal investigations and represented clients in connection with matters involving anti-bribery restrictions worldwide.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Orders Prosecution to Destroy Copies of Notes Found in Sean Combs' Prison Cell
- 2BIT Mining Bribery Scandal Highlights Trump-Biden Enforcement Gap
- 3AI Startup Founder Defrauded Investors of Millions, US Prosecutors Say
- 4Cyberattacks Slowing Down M&A Deals, Firm Report Finds
- 5$10 Million Settlement Reached for Baby Injured by Disconnected Ventilator
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250