How Companies Avoid Legal Pitfalls When Drafting NDAs
NDAs can help protect company trade secrets, but not if they're overly broad or poorly enforced.
October 25, 2018 at 03:05 PM
3 minute read
Nondisclosure agreements can stop intellectual property from walking out the door with departing employees, but only if companies draft them correctly.
In an attempt to cover all of a company's confidential bases, NDA drafts can be overly broad, using language that may not hold up in courts of states such as California and New York, where employees legally can't be stopped from things like discussing their salary with colleagues.
“As an employer, you're asking, 'What is it that I'm really wanting to protect?' and avoiding a situation where you really have an over broad agreement. Because an over broad agreement may be as useful as having no agreement at all if it's something that a court won't enforce,” said Sara Kula, a partner at DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr and head of the firm's employment practice group.
Michael Henry, the principal and founding member of IP-focused Henry Patent Law Firm, said companies should decide what type of information they want an NDA to apply to and define what the NDA applies to in a way that isn't overly broad.
“Make sure that the confidential information that's defined in the NDA is related to the employee's employment and [covers] stuff that is actually considered confidential by the company,” Henry advised.
It's also good to mark confidential information as confidential during an employee's time at the company, Henry said, so that they're not left to guess whether or not the NDA applies. He cautioned, however, that the mark of confidentiality should fall within reason—if a document is widely distributed or is publicly available information, the confidential stamp won't stop a court from deciding it falls outside of the NDA.
But it isn't just important to define what current and former employees can't speak about. Kula said a good NDA should also let employees know what they can speak about, especially when it comes to workers' rights. In the era of #MeToo, NDAs have faced scrutiny as a potential tool to keep employees from speaking out against harassment in the workplace or gender pay inequity.
“When drafting a nondisclosure agreement, there are exceptions built in to the disclosure limitations … there's going to be an exception for any disclosures required by law … so I always put in specific language to indicate that nothing in the agreement is meant to restrict or impede the employee from discussing these types of terms and conditioning of employment,” Kula said.
When it comes to another NDA concern, stifling employee creativity, Kula noted it's important to develop a company culture that rewards and encourages innovation from employees. Employees also can lay out whether or not they've invented something or produced an idea prior to joining a company during intake, so it's clear who has ownership.
On an employee's way out, Henry said companies should sit down and ensure confidential information has been destroyed or returned.
“One of the things smart tech companies will do as someone is departing, they'll have an exit interview to remind them of their obligations, and sometimes you can go so far as to call their new employer to make sure the new employer knows that this person has confidential information of your company,” Henry said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250