Compliance Chiefs Adapt, Staff Up to Meet New Customer Due Diligence Rule
Corporate compliance teams are growing in size and efficiency to meet FinCEN's new Customer Due Diligence requirements, a survey finds, but the regulatory hurdles have been a challenge for some.
October 30, 2018 at 02:13 PM
3 minute read
Five months after the U.S. Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network implemented new due diligence rules to crack down on money laundering, compliance teams have started adjusting to the rules.
A new industry report released this month from Thomson Reuters looks at how 253 anti-money-laundering compliance leaders have adapted to meet the new Customer Due Diligence requirements, or “know your customer” requirements. The May 2018-implemented rule requires applicable financial institutions to have policies and procedures designed to verify customer's identities, the identity of beneficial owners of companies opening accounts, understand the customer relationship, create risk profiles and monitor for suspicious transactions.
More than half of respondents reported the rule's regulatory criteria as its biggest challenge.
“The struggle is, if they were not necessarily doing certain things, they had to implement new processes and train their staff. Making sure that they are, from an auditing perspective, actually following through and doing all of the steps within their newly defined process. That's a big hurdle to overcome. It's a lot of change management,” said Steve Kraus, the director of corporate investigations integrated solutions for Thomson Reuters.
Another finding showed that a number of compliance leaders have shifted to collecting customer information when an account is opened, rather than later in the process. Currently, 40 percent of respondents said they collect a comprehensive amount of information at the start of a relationship with a customer. Only 31 percent of respondents did so in 2017.
A quarter of respondents collect most information within the first week of an account opening, and only 4 percent wait more than 30 days, down from 9 percent last year.
“It's harder to go back to your customer after you've already onboarded them, said that they are your customer, and then go back and ask them for additional information. You want to be proactive in getting that information up front and preventing any risk to your business, both financial or reputational, at the outset,” Kraus said.
There has also been a rise in staffing since the CDD, according to the report. According to the survey, 42 percent of respondents anticipated an increase in staff related to anti-money-laundering efforts and the CDD rule.
Of those, 28 percent said the anticipated increase will be for anti-money-laundering compliance purposes. Only 1 percent of respondents anticipated an increase in staff hired to focus on the CDD rules. Last year, 17 percent of respondents predicted an increase in staffing to plan for the CDD implementation.
“More people are needed to actually do the work, because they're just getting that much more data, and they need that much more data,” Kraus said.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readElaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250