Facebook GC Frets Over 'Election Integrity' as Midterms Loom
In the final months of his tenure at Facebook, Colin Stretch told lawyers at an ABA panel in Washington that his company recognizes "transparency" as a key to earning the trust of users and policymakers.
November 02, 2018 at 05:48 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Colin Stretch's days at Facebook are numbered, but that hasn't stopped him from worrying about the impact of companies like his ahead of Tuesday's midterm elections in the United States.
Stretch, Facebook's general counsel in Washington, D.C., since 2013, has plans to leave the media and technology company at the end of 2018. Speaking on a panel at the American Bar Association's 28th annual review of national security law on Friday, he said “election integrity generally, not just here but around the world” remains the issue that keeps him up at night and concerns him most regarding social media and national security.
Investigations into foreign meddling into the 2016 U.S. elections have helped put a spotlight on the ways Facebook's platform allowed users to amplify false information, including content generated by foreign interests that appeared designed to sway voters. Stretch said his company's close-working relationship with federal law enforcement and industry to combat terrorist propaganda could serve as a “blueprint” for thwarting disinformation campaigns moving forward.
The line marking what sort of content Facebook allows to be disseminated is constantly changing and, Stretch insisted, the company is working tirelessly to govern itself.
“There is a significant responsibility that we get it right. We do make mistakes, the line [of permissible content and behavior] does move, and so the only way we can engender the sort of trust both with people who use our services as well as policymakers is to be transparent about how we're thinking about these issues,” Stetch said on Friday.
Stretch said Facebook has “tremendous respect” for U.S. national security agencies and has put a “significant amount of resources” into ensuring that the company is responsive to requests for information—whether it ultimately chooses to comply or not.
The outcome of the midterm elections could help determine who fills Stretch's shoes at Facebook. Especially if the balance of power flips in the House of Representatives to Democratic control, a bevy of anticipated investigations could mean Facebook would be well-served by someone with deep ties on Capitol Hill. Some recruiters have predicted Facebook's next GC will be someone who knows the Hill inside-and-out.
Stretch, who was called to testify before the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee last November, held more experience in the judiciary and at the Supreme Court before joining Facebook. After clerking for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer in the 1990s, he was partner at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel in D.C., for 10 years. In recent months, he's taken to sharing content from his former firm on Twitter.
Stretch gave no hint about his future plans during his Friday appearance, but he appears unlikely to follow his brother Brian Stretch to California, where Brian Stretch was formerly the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of California.
In announcing his decision in July to leave Facebook, Colin Stretch noted that he knew the end of his tenure at the company would come when his family decided to leave California to return to Washington.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readAs AI Transforms Drug Development, FDA Is Scrambling to Figure Out Guardrails
5 minute readElection Outcome Could Spur Policy U-Turns Across Employment Landscape
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250