Amazon Announces 2 New HQs: How to Manage a Dispersed Department
Amazon is hardly the first company to geographically disperse employees in recent years, a transition that's left many GCs attempting to manage staff around the country and globe. The company confirmed Tuesday earlier reports that Long Island City, New York, and Crystal City, Virginia, will get new headquarters.
November 13, 2018 at 11:43 AM
4 minute read
This story has been updated from an earlier version with additional information after confirmation of the company's choice of headquarters would be split between Crystal City, Virginia, and Long Island City, New York.
Amazon is splitting its newest headquarters between Long Island City, New York, and Northern Virginia, the company confirmed on Tuesday, dispersing its growing workforce.
The company announced that it would invest $5 billion and create more than 50,000 jobs among the two new headquarters, and announced Nashville as a new operations center with more than 5,000 jobs.
While Amazon's search for a second (and, as it turns out, third) home base was one of the more public examples of companies' diversifying geographically, the tech giant is not the only company to open large offices away from its original HQ. For many general counsel, having a dispersed workforce and legal team is the new norm.
“Companies are much more global today and more likely to have non-U.S. offices and want to have legal support in those spaces,” said Jason Winmill, managing partner at legal department consulting company Argopoint. “So the [geographical] fragmentation of legal departments is here. It's in full swing. It's a reality, and many, many legal departments large and small grapple with that.”
Winmill said the transition from a centralized to dispersed legal department isn't always an easy one. If not managed well, different offices could have different cultures and feel disconnected and isolated from the rest of the organization.
|
➤➤ Get more in-house news and commentary with Inside Track, an email briefing from Law.com. Sign up here.
Expressing shared goals for department culture and management structure may help with that challenge. Nancy Jessen, the senior vice president of legal business solutions for UnitedLex said a good place to start is ensuring that legal staff in each office use the same titles for the same roles and follow the same promotion criteria.
She also said it's beneficial if team members and leadership roles can be spread among offices.
“You can't have one location be considered the 'good location' and everyone else is an outpost,” Jessen said. “Say we distribute our leadership, we distribute teams to force that interaction as well, because otherwise it becomes the land of the haves and have-nots.”
Legal teams can also take advantage of available technology to communicate with colleagues in other locations. Jessen said online messaging, video conferences and even phone calls are ways to bridge the gap between locations.
But meeting in-person always helps. Maureen Brundage, currently a senior adviser at BarkerGilmore, said making time to meet legal staff in person is a crucial way GCs and chief legal officers can create a departmentwide culture.
Brundage was previously the executive vice president, general counsel, corporate secretary and chief ethics officer of Chubb Corp., leading a legal team of more than 135 people spread around the globe. Every other year, she said legal staff from every location would gather at the company's headquarters in New Jersey.
Legal team members from Asia, Latin America and Europe were able to meet businesspeople at the company and their U.S.-based department colleagues during a series of multiday meetings.
Brundage said she also made a point to travel and visit various office locations around once a year. This, she said, is a helpful way for legal leaders to learn about what's going on companywide, directly or through reports. It also allowed her to speak with those in other offices about the value legal adds.
“Make sure people are feeling a part of the whole and not feeling isolated,” Brundage said. “As well as [that] you really know what's going on with your team around the world.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Ballooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
Am Law 100 Partners on Trump’s Short List to Replace Gensler as SEC Chair
4 minute readElon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250