US Senator Proposes Data Protection Bill Imposing Criminal Fines and Penalties for Breaches
U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, has announced draft legislation for a data protection bill that would impose severe criminal penalties for violations including heavy fines for companies, and possible 10- to 20-year prison sentences for senior executives at the world's largest data collectors.
November 07, 2018 at 04:12 PM
3 minute read
U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, has announced draft legislation for a data protection bill that would impose steep criminal penalties for violations of the law, including heavy fines for companies and possible 10-to-20-year prison sentences for senior executives at the world's largest data collectors.
Wyden announced Nov. 1 that he is seeking feedback on what he calls the Consumer Data Protection Act of 2018. If introduced and passed as it is currently written, the bill would allow the Federal Trade Commission to establish minimum privacy and cybersecurity standards and would allow for a national “do not track” system that would allow consumers to see which companies have their data. It also would allow for consumers to tell third-party companies to delete their information.
“My bill creates radical transparency for consumers, gives them new tools to control their information and backs it up with tough rules with real teeth to punish companies that abuse Americans' most private information,” Wyden said in the news release announcing the draft legislation.
If it became law, the bill would affect companies with $1 billion per year in revenue or those that hold the personal information of 50 million people or more. If those companies were found to be in violation of the law, they would face fines of up to 4 percent of their annual revenues, and senior executives of those companies could face 10 to 20 years in prison.
Congress has not passed a federal law regulating data brokers since the FTC released a May 2014 report on the data broker industry.
“I think it's interesting who would end up being targets [of an investigation],” Andrew Burt, chief privacy officer and legal engineer of Immuta, a data management company, said. “It's almost marrying personal and corporate responsibility.”
While this bill would be a federal law, Burt said that this would not get rid of the patchwork of data regulation laws that states already have in place. He said that, in the U.S., there has been a history of creating data laws for different sectors of industry.
“I think there is an appetite for a single standard,” Burt said. “What's interesting to me is that this only applies to organizations that amass a huge amount of data, so it's not going to be this single privacy standard that other people are discussing.”
Dimitri Sirota, the co-founder and CEO of BigID, a software company which helps companies protect personal information, said that he does not think the U.S. will ever get away from the “patchwork” of regulations governing data. However, he said bills such as Wyden's are important because companies tend to comply with regulations with the most serious ramifications.
“From a practical standpoint, I think companies always budget toward the regulation that's going to get them in the most trouble,” Sirota said.
Sirota said that, despite a very divided legislature, a bill like this would be able to pass because protection of data and privacy online is a bipartisan issue.
“I would say that, in a split Congress, this is the type of thing they could get passed,” Sirota said. “I do think it has support from both sides of the aisle.”
Other observers, however, feel the proposal is unlikely to pass as drafted, given strong lobbying by data brokers and others against other efforts to regulate the industry.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHealth Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
How a 200,000-Worker Global Enterprise Took Down the Silos and Made ESG Its Mission
4 minute readCorporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
Trending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250