Five Things GCs Can Expect From the New Congress
Democrats won the majority in the U.S. House of Representatives for the first time in eight years, but Republicans still control the Senate. Lawyers at Skadden and Fisher Phillips wrote about what companies (and their GCs) might anticipate from the new Congress in January.
November 08, 2018 at 06:17 PM
5 minute read
For the first time in eight years, Democrats hold a majority in the U.S. House of Representatives after the midterm elections, but any of their bills coming out of the House could stall in the still Republican-controlled Senate. On Wednesday , Margaret E. Krawiec, David B. Leland and Ivan A. Schlager, attorneys at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom published a blog post on how the Democratic House majority could dramatically change priorities for congressional oversight investigations and other activities that impact companies.
Benjamin Ebbink, of counsel at Fisher & Phillips in Sacramento, and Richard Meneghello, a partner at the firm in Portland, Oregon, also co-authored a report on what employers can expect with the new Congress in 2019 with respect to labor and employment laws.
Below are some key takeaways based on both reports.
- Immigration reform will most likely remain at a stalemate. Ebbink wrote that, despite immigration being a hot-button issue, he doesn't think reform bills will pass both houses. “There isn't much in terms of reform that folks should be anticipating,” Ebbink wrote. He said, despite immigration being important to industries such as agriculture, he wouldn't expect much to happen. Even if immigration reform passes in the House, it would most likely stall in the Senate, he said.
- If any employment-related bill is going to make it to the president's desk, it could be paid leave. Ebbink and Meneghello wrote in the Fisher Phillip's post that paid family leave has support from both sides of the aisle. “There are a lot of people talking about paid family leave,” Ebbink said in a phone interview. “That could potentially be one area where there is some discussion.” Ebbink said there has been support for paid family leave from everyone including President Donald Trump. In his post on the Fisher Phillips website, he said that some Republicans in the House and Senate have floated the idea of such a program. In August, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Florida, introduced a bill to allow new parents to draw early Social Security benefits for paid leave. That bill, however, has already received criticism from the left, according to Politico, and would most likely not be supported by Democrats in the House. “At least some in both parties have expressed a desire for a paid family leave law,” David Schwartz, a partner at Skadden's labor and employment group in New York said in an email. “However, the proposals to date take vastly different views on how to fund the leave, and a law on this topic coming out of the new Congress may be unlikely.”
- The fate of the Affordable Care Act is still pending. Despite not being able to get rid of so-called Obamacare when Republicans controlled both legislative houses, the ACA could still be undone at least in part. The Fisher Phillips post states that Texas v. Azar, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, will likely be decided soon. Whatever, the ruling, the post says, the case will likely end up in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then it could end up yet again before he U.S. Supreme Court. In September, Judge Reed O'Connor of the U.S. District Court for the the Northern District of Texas heard oral arguments over the ACA, according to The Los Angeles Times and questioned the attorneys involved on which provisions of the ACA should stand.
- The Trump tax cuts could be called into question. With a majority of Democrats in the house, the Trump tax cuts would most likely be called into question, according to the Skadden post. The Trump administration lowered the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. President Trump also has indicated in the past that he wants to cut the corporate tax rate even more in the future. “As part of their efforts, Democrats may turn to corporations for documents and information and set public hearings where CEOs are called to testify and disclose the amounts saved as a result of such tax cuts,” the Skadden post says.
- With a Democratic majority in the House, expect more requests for reports from the Government Accountability Office. Democrats may continue to make frequent use of the GAO to investigate not only Trump himself but also certain industries, according to the Skadden report. Because of the expected uptick in GAO reports that could lead to investigations, companies should take steps to prepare for such investigations, even if those inquiries are industrywide and not specific to a particular company. “A company might assess whether to proactively make changes to policies, procedures or business practices that might address Democratic concerns, as Congress frequently has used these investigations to force industry wide changes,” according to the post.
Also Read: Employment Law Implications After U.S. House Flips to Dems
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readElection Outcome Could Spur Policy U-Turns Across Employment Landscape
6 minute readEx-Twitter Exec Sues for $20M, Says Musk Fired Her as 'Petty Retribution'
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250