FTC Moves to Halt $100M Belize Real Estate Investment Scheme
James Kohm, associate director of the FTC's division of enforcement, said Sanctuary Belize and Andris Pukke raked in the huge sum while marketing false promises about dream retirement homes in a luxurious resort. He said the scheme may have fleeced as many as 1,000 U.S. residents and small-business owners near retirement age.
November 08, 2018 at 03:16 PM
4 minute read
The Federal Trade Commission said Thursday it has temporarily shut down a Belize real estate investment scheme that it says targeted U.S. senior citizens, calling it the largest such scam it has ever encountered.
James Kohm, associate director of the FTC's division of enforcement, said Sanctuary Belize raked in $100 million while marketing false promises about dream retirement homes in a luxurious resort. He said the scheme primarily targeted U.S. residents and small-business owners near retirement age.
The action underscored the flaccidity of the FTC's civil enforcement muscles, when Kohm revealed that Andris Pukke, a convicted California felon who it says established the scheme, allegedly ran the operation even while he was serving 18 months in prison for obstruction of justice related to a previous investment scheme, according to the federal complaint.
Pukke could not immediately be reached for comment. Pukke is represented by Pamela Thakur, founder of the Thakur Law Firm in Anaheim. She also was not immediately available for comment.
Kohm also said the Belize property, which Pukke owned, was ordered seized in the previous U.S. action against Pukke, but that he was able to obstruct the receiver from taking control.
The legal action listed as defendants seven named individuals, including Pukke; 15 real estate or marketing companies; one Belize bank; and a property owners association. Four of the defendants reside in the U.S.—Pukke, Peter Baker, Luke Chadwick and Frank Costanzo—and all have been ordered not to leave the U.S. without court approval.
The FTC was granted the temporary restraining order, which also froze defendants' assets, by the U.S. district court in Maryland. The agency has also filed a 47-page complaint against the same defendants seeking a permanent injunction and seizure of all assets in hopes of reimbursing duped investors.
Kohm said his agency used people posing as owners of a small exercise and fitness business to engage with the sellers. The FTC even created a fake website for the business. He said the effort was “more robust” than the usual sting operation.
According to the FTC, the defendants allegedly operated a set of interrelated businesses and ran commercials on Fox News and Bloomberg News advertising parcels of land that were part of the luxury development in Belize. They also advertised the property through infomercials on national TV. Consumers who expressed interest would receive a call from California-based telemarketers who then made a series of false claims including about what the complex offered, when it would be finished and how much lots would appreciate.
Although the FTC's investigation is still ongoing, Kohm said it is believed that at least 1,000 investors lost money.
Specifically, the FTC charged the defendants with violating the FTC Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule. In addition, it charged Belize's Atlantic International Bank with assisting and facilitating the Belize scheme. A phone number for the bank listed on its website was disconnected, and it did not immediately respond to an email.
The FTC has also filed a contempt motion against defendants Pukke, Baker and John Usher related to Sanctuary Belize; a second contempt motion against Pukke and relief defendant John Vipulis seeking money Pukke owes the commission; and a third contempt motion against Pukke, Baker and Usher seeking to unwind a prior real estate transfer to enable the FTC to secure the unsold portions of the Belize land parcel.
The court documents remain under seal for the time being, but the commission has posted most of them on its website.
The case is being heard by U.S. District Judge Peter Messitte of the District of Maryland. The court has set a Nov. 19 hearing to determine whether to issue an injunction and continue the freeze on defendants' assets.
The FTC is represented by its general counsel, Alden Abbott, and staff attorneys Jonathan Cohen, Benjamin Theisman, Amanda Kostner and Khouryanna DiPrima.
This article has been updated from an earlier version with additional detail.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHere Are Some Answers to Employers' Many Legal Questions About the Coronavirus
8 minute readFTC Commissioner's Social Media Statement Is a Heads-Up to Advertisers, Influencers
Report: 97% of General Counsel Think a Recession Could Be Near, but Few Say They're Prepared
3 minute readTesla, CBS and United See New General Counsel: February 2019 In-House Moves
12 minute readTrending Stories
- 1From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Julie Cantor, Associate General Counsel at Studs, Inc.
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Chris Correnti, President & CEO & General Counsel AGC America, Inc.
- 4‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
- 5Cravath Matches 'Special' and Year-End Bonuses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250