FTC Moves to Halt $100M Belize Real Estate Investment Scheme
James Kohm, associate director of the FTC's division of enforcement, said Sanctuary Belize and Andris Pukke raked in the huge sum while marketing false promises about dream retirement homes in a luxurious resort. He said the scheme may have fleeced as many as 1,000 U.S. residents and small-business owners near retirement age.
November 08, 2018 at 03:16 PM
4 minute read
The Federal Trade Commission said Thursday it has temporarily shut down a Belize real estate investment scheme that it says targeted U.S. senior citizens, calling it the largest such scam it has ever encountered.
James Kohm, associate director of the FTC's division of enforcement, said Sanctuary Belize raked in $100 million while marketing false promises about dream retirement homes in a luxurious resort. He said the scheme primarily targeted U.S. residents and small-business owners near retirement age.
The action underscored the flaccidity of the FTC's civil enforcement muscles, when Kohm revealed that Andris Pukke, a convicted California felon who it says established the scheme, allegedly ran the operation even while he was serving 18 months in prison for obstruction of justice related to a previous investment scheme, according to the federal complaint.
Pukke could not immediately be reached for comment. Pukke is represented by Pamela Thakur, founder of the Thakur Law Firm in Anaheim. She also was not immediately available for comment.
Kohm also said the Belize property, which Pukke owned, was ordered seized in the previous U.S. action against Pukke, but that he was able to obstruct the receiver from taking control.
The legal action listed as defendants seven named individuals, including Pukke; 15 real estate or marketing companies; one Belize bank; and a property owners association. Four of the defendants reside in the U.S.—Pukke, Peter Baker, Luke Chadwick and Frank Costanzo—and all have been ordered not to leave the U.S. without court approval.
The FTC was granted the temporary restraining order, which also froze defendants' assets, by the U.S. district court in Maryland. The agency has also filed a 47-page complaint against the same defendants seeking a permanent injunction and seizure of all assets in hopes of reimbursing duped investors.
Kohm said his agency used people posing as owners of a small exercise and fitness business to engage with the sellers. The FTC even created a fake website for the business. He said the effort was “more robust” than the usual sting operation.
According to the FTC, the defendants allegedly operated a set of interrelated businesses and ran commercials on Fox News and Bloomberg News advertising parcels of land that were part of the luxury development in Belize. They also advertised the property through infomercials on national TV. Consumers who expressed interest would receive a call from California-based telemarketers who then made a series of false claims including about what the complex offered, when it would be finished and how much lots would appreciate.
Although the FTC's investigation is still ongoing, Kohm said it is believed that at least 1,000 investors lost money.
Specifically, the FTC charged the defendants with violating the FTC Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule. In addition, it charged Belize's Atlantic International Bank with assisting and facilitating the Belize scheme. A phone number for the bank listed on its website was disconnected, and it did not immediately respond to an email.
The FTC has also filed a contempt motion against defendants Pukke, Baker and John Usher related to Sanctuary Belize; a second contempt motion against Pukke and relief defendant John Vipulis seeking money Pukke owes the commission; and a third contempt motion against Pukke, Baker and Usher seeking to unwind a prior real estate transfer to enable the FTC to secure the unsold portions of the Belize land parcel.
The court documents remain under seal for the time being, but the commission has posted most of them on its website.
The case is being heard by U.S. District Judge Peter Messitte of the District of Maryland. The court has set a Nov. 19 hearing to determine whether to issue an injunction and continue the freeze on defendants' assets.
The FTC is represented by its general counsel, Alden Abbott, and staff attorneys Jonathan Cohen, Benjamin Theisman, Amanda Kostner and Khouryanna DiPrima.
This article has been updated from an earlier version with additional detail.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHere Are Some Answers to Employers' Many Legal Questions About the Coronavirus
8 minute readFTC Commissioner's Social Media Statement Is a Heads-Up to Advertisers, Influencers
Report: 97% of General Counsel Think a Recession Could Be Near, but Few Say They're Prepared
3 minute readTesla, CBS and United See New General Counsel: February 2019 In-House Moves
12 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250