4 Ways Midterm Results Could Impact Tech
Newly elected members of the U.S. House and Senate may likely try their hand at more closely regulating tech companies and promoting privacy rights online.
November 09, 2018 at 11:13 AM
3 minute read
Changes in Washington, D.C., following Tuesday's midterm election could ripple their way out to Silicon Valley—and the tech sector more broadly—as Democrats take control of the House of Representatives.
In the Senate, Republicans gained seats. While it's still unclear exactly how a split Congress will change tech, the industry has faced criticism from members of both parties on issues such as national security, antitrust and privacy.
Here are some of the possible impacts tech could see from Tuesday's election results:
1. Looming Privacy Laws
In the year of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation implementation and the passage of the California Consumer Privacy Act, data privacy concerns are at the forefront of minds in Silicon Valley and Washington, D.C. Democrats may be a stronger proponent of data privacy regulation than their peers across the aisle. Two Democrats, Sens. Ed Markey of Massachusetts and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, proposed a “privacy bill of rights” in April 2018.
U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna, a Democrat covering Silicon Valley who was re-elected in the November election, also proposed a “internet bill of rights” that is based on 10 core privacy and security principles.
2. Potential Scrutiny From Committee Members
Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. of New Jersey, the highest-ranking Democrat on the Energy and Commerce Committee, released a statement Wednesday outlining potential goals for the committee post-midterms. One of his listed agenda items was to “provide meaningful privacy and data security protection.”
3. Skeptics in the Senate
Now-former Tennessee Rep. Marsha Blackburn won a Senate set on Tuesday. The Republican senator has expressed concern over alleged bias against conservatives on social media platforms. In July she told The Hill that she plans “on keeping the pressure on big tech.”
4. Net Neutrality
Pallone's agenda also included a vow to “protect net neutrality.” The Federal Communications Commission rolled back Obama-era net neutrality regulations earlier this year, a move that drew criticism from a number of tech companies, including Google, Twitter, Mozilla and Netflix. Since the repeal, many tech companies have taken legal action against the FCC. On the Senate side, newly elected Blackburn has argued against net neutrality in the past.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250