Altria GC Expresses Opposition on New FDA Proposal to Ban Menthol Cigarettes
Murray Garnick, the general counsel to tobacco company Altria Group, expressed opposition to the FDA's proposed ban on menthol cigarettes Thursday. Other companies have raised the possibility of legal action.
November 15, 2018 at 05:24 PM
3 minute read
The general counsel of Altria Group, Inc. said the tobacco company is against a ban on menthol cigarettes proposed by the Food and Drug Administration Thursday but that it will “stay engaged” with the process.
Murray Garnick, the executive vice president and general counsel of Richmond, Virginia-based Altria Group Inc. said in a press release Thursday that the company is against a total ban on menthol cigarettes. According to the release, menthol products were approximately 20 percent of Altria's U.S. tobacco division Philip Morris USA retail share as of the third quarter.
“We continue to believe that a total ban on menthol cigarettes or flavored cigars would be an extreme measure not supported by the science and evidence. We expect that establishing product standards on menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars will be a multi-year, deliberative process, and we will be fully engaged throughout,” Garnick said in the press release. “None of FDA's proposed actions is self-executing. Each will require further action by FDA.”
According to reports from the Wall Street Journal, tobacco company Reynolds American Inc. said it would possibly take legal action should a ban on menthol cigarettes be implemented. RAI did not immediately respond to request for comment.
Thursday's FDA announcement came from Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, who named a ban on menthol cigarettes as one of many ways the agency hopes to protect youth from health risks associated with smoking, especially youth of color.
In Thursday's release, Gottlieb said that menthol cigarettes are especially popular among African-American minors.
“I noted that the popularity of menthol cigarettes with youth is especially troubling. In fact, youth smokers are more likely to use menthol cigarettes than any other age group,” Gottlieb wrote.
“More than half (54 percent) of youth smokers ages 12-17 use menthol cigarettes, compared to less than one-third of smokers ages 35 and older. Prevalence of menthol use is even higher among African-American youth, with data showing that 7 out of 10 African-American youth smokers select menthol cigarettes,” he continued.
Gottlieb then said the FDA would advance a notice of proposed rule-making to ban menthol in cigarettes and cigars. He also proposed a policy to ban flavored cigarettes and cigars and tighten restrictions on e-cigarettes. Garnick expressed his support for tougher e-cigarette regulations in Thursday's press release.
“We welcome FDA's efforts to address the underage use of e-vapor products. That is why we believe Congress should raise the legal age of purchase for all tobacco products to 21,” Garnick said. “We also applaud FDA's continued recognition of the potential for innovative, less harmful products that can deliver nicotine to adults who want them.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readElaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Trending Stories
- 1New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
- 2Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
- 3'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
- 4Productivity Suite Startup Macro Announces $12 Million Funding Round
- 5Rudy Giuliani Loses Bid to Dismiss $1.3 Million Davidoff Hutcher & Citron Suit Over Unpaid Legal Fees
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250