Prepping a Mock Notification Letter Before a Cybersecurity Breach Hits
During a company's process of creating their mock letter, they will undoubtedly expose weaknesses in their systems, procedures, policies and responsibilities. This gives time to start addressing these problems proactively.
November 16, 2018 at 07:00 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
No one in the security industry should be surprised to know that the financial and reputational impact of a breach is severe. According to a recent Harris Poll, studies show that 75 percent of consumers won't do business with a company if they don't trust it to protect their data. If the incident involves the theft of more than 1 million records (known as a mega breach), it can be almost impossible to restore the confidence levels to what they were pre-breach. In 2017 alone, there were 16 mega breaches.
Being prepared for the worst before it even happens can minimize the damage in the event of a cybersecurity incident. To get any company ready for a cybersecurity event, the first step is to organize a team to write a mock breach notification letter. For this to be successful, you must shock the organization from the top down. Too many table tops and incident planning exercises start from the bottom up and do not represent the gravity of a beach—but not this. The product of this exercise, a simple letter, will represent your message to the world about your failure in the event you have a breach. It fundamentally provides the introduction of your problem to the world—how will you be judged?
Before Beginning the Exercise
While preparing to write your mock breach notification letter, you should be asking yourself the hard questions about what to do, what you will need, and who is responsible if your organization is the one to experience a significant data breach. Even though the actual details of the letter will differ depending on the actual incident, being organized and prepared will enable an organization's team to issue a real breach notification letter in a timely fashion. A rapid response can help solve the incident at hand and build back trust in the brand. Thematically auditors and lawyers will judge your decisions prior; however, your clients, customers, and partners will judge you on your response.
When asking these questions before writing the letter, a company will likely discover that significant internal communications work is required. The person briefing groups about the incident and writing the letter should use plain language so everyone in the company can understand, especially higher-level executives who may not have a background in breach response or security operations. It is important to explain the technical aspects and incident response, the long-term impact of a breach and what it could mean to the organization as a whole. For readability, asking someone who does not have a strong technical background to draft the letter may be the best option, however, always work from the same source of truth—generally the investigative team.
Introducing The Response Team and Opening The Letter
Once company executives have been briefed on the incident, they must establish a point of contact customers can go to with any questions or concerns; this is client management to a degree never experienced. Ensure that both the legal and client management teams understand the details of the breach first. The legal team will ensure that the company notifies customers within compliance standards in accordance to the specific business location, as well as provide review of the actual data breach notification letter. Client management can work closely with the legal team to provide feedback on the customer notification process as well as act as a vessel to see how the customers are feeling after the incident. Expect a difficult renewal processes for 12 to 36 months.
Establish a team and ideally a special call center for these groups and include their contact information as the first element of the letter. Additionally, host status calls for all current clients. Expect them to go beyond the allotted times and many technical questions. As a result, they must be attended by client management, an ELT member, and a technical resource from the security team (that has been briefed and had some type of media training).
Elements of the Security Incident
Next, the letter should share information about the breach so customers can be briefed on exactly what happened. First, include the basic details:
- When your company discovered the breach;
- Known duration of the event; and
- A high-level description of the information involved.
After, move into the specifics on the event itself, which will include:
- A basic description of how the breach occurred and how many people were affected;
- How your company is responding to the incident;
- A comment about the outside help involved (government, law enforcement, investigative and response experts);
- A description of ongoing plan, with when and how updates will be provided; and
- Advice on how the customer should proceed if action is required.
As time goes on the following information will be helpful to share:
- Information on the perpetrator of the incident (difficult and dangerous, but valuable to share if criminal, nation state, etc.);
- Information on the scope of known harm, such as further problems caused by the breach, adversary activity, known fraud, etc.; and
- Information on how maturity and efficacy of the security team has improved.
Tip: The person drafting the letter should ask themselves what they would want to know if they had their personal data compromised. Most, including law makers and politicians, expect to see credit monitoring services, but it really provides little net value prevent downstream misuse.
Lessons from Mock Breach Notification Letters
It may take several months for an enterprise to perfect its letter. The exercise itself is a starting point, a way to ensure the right people are in the loop, understand what information they need to know and have a template for the letter to ensure responses are quick and efficient.
During a company's process of creating their mock letter, they will undoubtedly expose weaknesses in their systems, procedures, policies and responsibilities. This gives an organization time to start addressing these problems before disaster mitigation and response actually occurs. By going through this process, a business ensures that when they do issue a real notification letter they will be prepared to answer any questions from employees or customers.
Steve Moore serves as the chief security strategist at Exabeam, the smarter SIEM company, and is responsible for driving solutions for threat detection and response, as well as advising customers in breach management and program development.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
California Becomes 2nd State to Give Brain Waves Data Privacy Protections, With Mixed Reaction
NH, KY Join Patchwork of States' Data Privacy Laws 'Squarely in the Middle'
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250