Report: Litigation Down But Regulatory Proceedings on the Rise
Norton Rose Fulbright published a report on Thursday indicating that companies are facing less litigation, but more regulatory proceedings because of increased regulations around the globe.
November 16, 2018 at 03:56 PM
3 minute read
While litigation is down, companies are facing more regulatory proceedings and arbitration, according to the 2018 Litigation Trends Annual Survey of 365 in-house legal professionals of mostly U.S.-based global companies, published by Norton Rose Fulbright on Thursday.
“This results this year provide some unexpected findings,” said Norton Rose Fulbright global head of litigation, Gerry Pecht, in the report.
The report found that 67 percent of respondents felt that regulators have become more interventionist over the past year, while 33 percent felt regulators have become less interventionist.
Pecht said “that many jurisdictions have tightened up on regulations. There have been new regulations that have gone into place [across the globe].”
Pecht added that one might think because of the current administration in the U.S. that many companies would not be facing regulatory proceedings. However, many of those who responded work for companies with a global footprint.
“Those respondents who put regulation at the top of their list of concerns say this is because regulation is increasing and with it, much greater levels of financial exposure and reputational risk,” the report states.
In the report, Pecht said some companies are not as concerned with regulation because they believe they have strong compliance programs, and take heed of government promises to reduce regulation.
The survey also found that cybersecurity is at the top of the minds of many legal leaders. According to the report, 66 percent of respondents feel more exposed because of cybersecurity concerns.
“Only 10 percent said cybersecurity and data protection disputes were there top concern at present, but within this group it was evident that the concern was substantial—over a quarter described their exposure in this area as significant and almost as many were dealing with a live matter,” the report states.
Because of the heavy concentration on cybersecurity, the survey also asked respondents to list what they use to mitigate the risk of a cyberincident. Some of those steps include educating other in-house counsel, data mapping, penetration tests, insurance, vendor audits and isolating sensitive data.
The report also found that an increase in international business operations has led to an increase in both cross-border discovery issues and data protection issues.
“Legal departments are reporting a much more substantial rise in the need to balance discovery obligations in one jurisdiction with data protection regulations in another—the number facing this challenge has gone up by 11 percent, a notable jump in just 12 months,” the report says.
Looking to the future, 27 percent of respondents believe there will be an increase in the volume of disputes their company will face.
Of those who were surveyed for the 2018 Litigation Report, 44 percent were general counsels, 25 percent were association/deputy/assistant general counsels, and 11 percent were heads of litigation. An additional 21 percent of respondents fell into the “other” category.
The median revenue of the companies included in the survey is $1.5 billion. The industries the respondents worked in are financial, energy, infrastructure, mining and commodities (IMC), life sciences and health care and technology and innovation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Adoption, Data Center Building Boom Opening More Doors for Cybercriminals, Many of Them Teenagers
Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
- 2Del. Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
- 3Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
- 4Bridge the Communication Gap: The Benefits of Having (and Being) a Bilingual Mediator
- 5CFIUS Is Locked and Loaded, but What Lies Ahead for CFIUS Enforcement Activity?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250