ACC Survey Finds Most GCs Come From In-House, Earn an Average $400,000+
Aspiring general counsel can take a tip from a new study that shows 70 percent of U.S. general counsel rose from an in-house counsel background rather than arrive from a law firm.
November 27, 2018 at 03:05 PM
4 minute read
Aspiring general counsel can take a tip from a new study that shows 70 percent of U.S. general counsel rose from an in-house counsel background rather than arrived from a law firm.
Also, the typical GC, according to the study's findings, is a middle-aged male, living in California or New York, working in the financial services industry, and earning about $408,000 a year with salary and bonuses. The just-released study, 2019 General Counsel Landscape, was conducted by the Association of Corporate Counsel and LawGeex, a legal technology firm specializing in automated contract review.
The study used data from various sources in the past year, including LinkedIn profiles, job listings and compensation surveys conducted by ACC. ACC said there are 113,000 GCs in the U.S., and the study covered some 34,000.
Veta Richardson, president and CEO of the Association of Corporate Counsel in Washington, D.C., in an interview with Corporate Counsel Tuesday, said the high percentage of general counsel who come from in-house legal positions “shows in-house counsel are afforded unmatched levels of respect in corporations,” Richardson said. “They understand the business and how to navigate it. They are deeply rooted in the challenges an enterprise faces.”
She said in-house lawyers also have different communication skills than law firm attorneys. “In a law firm, lawyers communicate mostly lawyer-to-lawyer. But in-house counsel communicate lawyer-to-business people much more frequently. The in-house counsel experience is increasingly a requirement [for general counsel] and not just a preference.”
Richardson said, “we are clearly in the age of the general counsel. Over the last decade or so we have witnessed unparalleled growth in the power and prestige of the general counsel role.”
As evidence, she cited the study as showing GCs today are involved in a range of areas beyond “talking about what the law says and making sure companies don't violate it.”
The GC role now includes complex legal issues, enterprise risk management, regulatory enforcement, environmental sustainability, geopolitical pressures and business strategy, she said.
But Richardson said both she and LawGeex were “surprisingly disappointed” by the still prevalent gender disparities revealed in the study: Women make up only 31 percent of the GC population, and 30 percent within the Fortune 500. And male GCs were paid an average of 39 percent more than females. But while 48 percent of women in-house counsel recognize the gender pay gap, only 8 percent of men do, the study said.
“Look at the law schools filled with women and at the in-house profession, where nearly 50 percent of all in-house counsel are women,” Richardson said. “They have the background [to be general counsel]. We are disappointed not seeing it.”
She said corporations are still ahead of law firms in promoting women into leadership positions, however. And the brightest spot, she noted, is that the study found 43 percent of general counsel hired in the past year were female.
Among other findings in the study:
- The pay for a Fortune 500 General Counsel can be as much as $6.7 million annually. Management skills are the top skill listed in GC LinkedIn profiles, cited by 53 percent of all GCs as a core skill on their LinkedIn profiles, followed by litigation (47 percent), corporate law (41 percent) and legal writing (35 percent).
- Finance attracts more GCs than any other industry, with 17 percent of all GCs working in the sector, followed by government, technology and manufacturing, each with 10 percent.
- Skills related to “business” comprise the top words used by companies when recruiting a GC, based on an analysis of 100 job ads for general counsel. Business is mentioned 306 times across 100 job ads, beating second-placed compliance (257 mentions), traditional legal expertise such as knowledge of “agreements” (113 mentions), “risk” (107), “contract” (67) and drafting (57).
- About 27 percent of GCs also hold the position of executive vice president, and 27 percent are senior vice presidents.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readEx-Red Robin CLO Joins Norton Rose Fulbright After Helping Sell Latest Employer for $4.9 Billion
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250