The CFTC Releases Starter Guide to Smart Contracts
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has published a primer on smart contracts to offer guidance on the risks and benefits of the new blockchain backed technology.
November 27, 2018 at 01:03 PM
3 minute read
In-house lawyers with a budding blockchain interest just got an early holiday gift—a public primer guide to smart contracts from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
The CFTC's LabCFTC released “A CFTC Primer on Smart Contracts” Tuesday to help explain the new blockchain-based technology's risks, benefits and challenges. The guide comes at a time of regulatory uncertainty for the fast-growing blockchain industry and provides some clarity for in-house lawyers interested in implementing smart contracts.
In a 32-page document, the CFTC outlines the basics of smart contracts — starting with what they are. According to the CFTC, which regulates futures and option markets, smart contracts are “a set of coded computer functions.”
Smart contracts may include elements of a traditional binding contracts as well as self-executing code that pushes different actions based on changes to terms in the contract, such as fluxes in weather or reference rate. They can be legally binding.
Blockchain technology used in smart contracts can also allow real time updates authorized by involved parties and offer security through cryptography.
There are a number of examples of when this could be useful outlined in the guide, including self-executing insurance, tracking transportation rentals and payments and calculating and transferring premiums during credit default swaps.
The CFTC's guide outlines some of the other benefits of smart contracts. Automation can reduce the time and cost of creating contracts and can help standardize contracts across a business and provide clarity around execution.
But there are also some risks. According to the guide, smart contracts could illegally circumnavigate protections available in a traditional contract. There's also a risk of decreased transparency, an increased risk of cyber threats, and the potential for fraud through nefarious code, according to the CFTC.
The guide states that good governance of smart contracts could combat many of the risks. Standards should appear early in smart contract development and ”may assign responsibility for smart contract design and operation, and establish mechanisms for dispute resolution.”
“Good governance standards for smart contracts may help to address the challenges and risks that they present,” the guide said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Trade Wars: Five Tips for Legal Teams to Manage Tariffs and Trade in Trump II
- 2Balancing Attorney-Client Privilege With a Lawyer’s Right to Defend Against Allegations of Wrongdoing
- 3Public Interest Calendar of Events
- 4Sharpening Residential Insurance Fraud Defense Strategies: Insights for Insurers to Mitigate Risk in 2025
- 5Reversal of Fortune: Restoring Owners’ Equity Under New Jersey’s Tax Sale Law
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250