New Survey Shows Wide Range of Salaries Throughout Corporate Law
A new survey from ALM Legal Intelligence looked at how much in-house lawyers are making at a variety of legal department roles.
November 30, 2018 at 11:40 AM
4 minute read
Legal departments are more than their chief legal officer when it comes to compensation.
A new survey from Corporate Counsel affiliate ALM Legal Intelligence asked 47 legal departments about their compensation structures for lawyers at each level of their organization. Respondents included private and public companies, nonprofits and government organizations.
Fifteen responding organizations had more than $10 billion in annual sales, while 10 had annual sales between $10 to $3 billion and 19 had $3 billion or less. Most departments had more than 25 staff, while almost a third had between 11 to 25 lawyers, and 29.8 percent had 10 lawyers or fewer.
Respondents' CLO's average total compensation was just under $550,000. But those at the higher end of the spectrum earned around $900,000 annually, while CLOs in the bottom end earned around $300,000.
CLO compensation also varied by department size. For CLOs in the “over 25 lawyers” department size category—which ranged from 26 lawyers to more than 350—the average total compensation was more than $700,000.
Jason Winmill, managing partner at legal department consulting company Argopoint, said the large range in legal department size for the “over 25 lawyers” category could contribute to the range in pay for CLOs in the category.
“The 250-person legal department is very different than the 25-person legal department,” he said.
CLOs with fewer than 10 in-house lawyers made, on average, less than $600,000.
“There's a wide range of chief legal officers. That role varies a lot. It's a critical role for the company,” Winmill said. He added, “They're willing to pay a lot for it but … what they pay really varies.”
John Gilmore, co-founder and managing partner at consulting firm BarkerGilmore, said that companies seeking the best of the best will need to pay more than $700,000. He heard top general counsel roles with almost $1 million compensations described as underpaid. He said that the survey's findings don't match what he's seen in the legal industry, possibly because of the small sample size.
“Because it is such a limited sample, the data doesn't really reflect a lot of what we see out there in the market,” Gilmore said.
ALM Legal Intelligence's 2018 General Counsel Compensation Survey, published earlier this year, looked at the pay of Fortune 1000 legal leaders as listed in 2017 proxy filings. On average, those GCs had a total cash compensation of $2,028,221, which includes salary, bonus and nonequity incentives.
A study released earlier this week from the Association of Corporate Counsel and LawGeex found the average GC earns about $408,000 with salary and bonuses.
There was a smaller pay range for non-CLO roles in the latest ALM Legal Intelligence survey as well. On average, respondents' deputy general counsel and division counsel—lawyers who lead an employment team or other legal faction within the department—both made around $400,000 a year. Winmill said this similar pay could indicate many division counsel are acting as deputy GCs.
No respondents with fewer than 10 lawyers reported having a deputy general counsel.
Respondents' managing attorneys, defined in the survey as lawyers with “supervision over several salaried lawyers” earned around $300,000 on average.
On average, nonmanagement in-house positions at respondent departments were likely to pay less than managerial roles. However, high level specialists, who are not managers but have more than 12 years of experience in an area, are the exception, earning on average more than $250,000 a year. The average was more than $200,000 for responding legal teams of all sizes.
“In-house legal departments over the past 10 to 20 years have generally been growing and increasing their expertise,” Winmill said. “In general, they have more resources and more funding. And there's often been a sense that it makes sense if there is recurring specialty work to have a specialist in house.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoogle Fails to Secure Long-Term Stay of Order Requiring It to Open App Store to Rivals
'Am I Spending Time in the Right Place?' SPX Technologies CLO Cherée Johnson on Living and Leading With Intent
9 minute read'It Was the Next Graduation': How an In-House Lawyer Became a Serial Entrepreneur
9 minute readRenee Meisel, GC of UnitedLex, on Understanding and Growing the Business
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 1—Managing Risk
- 3Change Is Coming to the EEOC—But Not Overnight
- 4Med Mal Defense Win Stands as State Appeals Court Rejects Arguments Over Blocked Cross-Examination
- 5Rejecting 'Blind Adherence to Outdated Precedent,’ US Judge Goes His Own Way on Attorney Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250