4 Key Things for Counsel to Consider in a Bankruptcy Like Sears
Corporate Counsel spoke to attorneys Dean G. Rallis Jr. and Jack Raisner about what in-house counsel need to consider when their company has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
December 03, 2018 at 03:28 PM
3 minute read
Recently, Sears filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in New York. As a part of the bankruptcy, the company will shut down 142 of the 687 stores it has left, on top of 46 store closings already announced earlier. The company employs 68,000 people, according to a CNBC report, and it is not clear how many of them would be laid off as a result of the store closures.
The CEO of the company, Eddie Lampert, said in an email to company employees that he will be stepping down as CEO. He will, however, remain a member of the board of directors.
Corporate Counsel spoke to Dean G. Rallis Jr., of counsel at Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten, a full-service law firm based in Pasadena, California, with other West Coast offices, and Jack Raisner, a partner at employment law firm Outten & Golden in New York, about what in-house counsel need to consider when their company has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
1. Compliance with state and federal labor and pension laws: With the announcement that stores will be closing, the company will have to make sure it is acting within the guidelines set forth in the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. Raisner said that any company about to lay off a large number of people must give the employees 60 days' notice to remain compliant with the act. “I think it's likely that it will be a planned closing notice. As long as they do that, they [Sears] will have complied with the WARN Act,” Raisner said.
2. Employee morale. Rallis said that keeping the employees on board is important during a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. “For Sears to keep things on an even keel, it needs to have the commitment of its employees.” He said he would expect the in-house counsel at Sears to work with HR to build a web portal where employees can have questions asked and answered.
3. Vendor morale. Sears will need to make sure it maintains open communication with its vendors. It will have to consider which vendors would want to continue to work with Sears. Rallis said that many vendors would consider Sears a major source of revenue and will be hesitant to cut ties. On the flip side, those vendors would need to consider whether or not they want to extend credit to Sears, or try to negotiate a cash-on-delivery arrangement to make sure that they are paid.
4. Identify important vendors. In-house counsel will need to help the company identify important vendors so that the company can file a motion in the bankruptcy court to pay those vendors. These will be the vendors that Sears is unable to do business without. It will be unclear who those vendors are until the motion is filed, Rallis said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
Ben & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute read'It's Not About Speed': Forging Strong Legal Department-Law Firm Relationships Starts With Humility, Trust
6 minute readNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250