National Women in Law Awards: Juanita Brooks
PrincipalFish & Richardson
December 03, 2018 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
Juanita Brooks, a litigator and principal in Fish & Richardson's San Diego office, knows what it's like to be treated as less than an equal by other lawyers.
In the late 1970s, Brooks joined the Federal Defenders of San Diego, where she represented offenders who were charged with federal crimes but financially unable to hire lawyers. Brooks said the program is race and gender blind. However, some lawyers she faced in courts were not.
“As a young Latina in San Diego, I was constantly mistaken for the interpreter,” Brooks said, noting that other lawyers would call her over to interpret for them. “It never occurred to them that I was a lawyer.”
Brooks said hard times in her early life taught her “to be a hard worker and keep her eye on the ball.” Her father, who was in the Air Force, left his wife and two children when Brooks was 9 years old, forcing her mother to support the family.
“We kind of scraped by,” she said. “It wasn't easy.”
Brooks wanted to go to college and enrolled in San Diego State University, where a professor encouraged her to go to law school. She did, graduating from Yale Law School in 1977. In 1980, Brooks became the first female criminal defense attorney in San Diego to hang out her shingle. Specializing in white-collar criminal defense, Brooks set up her private practice in an old house where several male attorneys formerly with Federal Defenders had offices. Brooks said she referred cases to her male colleagues, but they rarely referred cases to her. “I was told men had families to support,” she recalled.
Brooks began doing civil litigation, including patent cases, after joining Mckenna & Cuneo in 1993. She moved to Fish in 2000 and now has a complex litigation practice, with an emphasis on patent litigation.
In February of this year, Brooks led an all-female team representing Gilead Sciences at a hearing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to convince the appellate court to back a trial judge's decision to throw out a $200 million jury award against their client for the infringement of two Merck & Co. patents.
In its April 25 opinion in Gilead Sciences Inc. v. Merck & Co., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment that the patents were unenforceable because of Merck's ”unclean hands.” The lower court found that a Merck patent prosecutor had breached an ethical firewall in prosecuting the company's patents and gave false testimony about his role in a deposition.
But Brooks has been much more than a litigator at Fish.
“She's a champion of women,” said Betsy Flanagan, a principal in Fish's Minneapolis office. In her first “big-time trial experience,” Flanagan was second chair at a trial for which Brooks was the first chair. Flanagan said she was able to put on witnesses and cross-examine them while Brooks worked with her to ensure her success. Brooks did that, Flanagan said, despite carrying a heavy load herself.
As a member of the firm's management committee from 2005-2008 and again from 2016 to the present, Brooks has backed policies changing the culture and diversity of Fish and becoming blueprints for similar policies at other law firms. For more than 10 years, Fish has had a formal diversity initiative that Brooks helped to design. That includes its 1L Diversity Fellowship Program that provides fellowships to first-year law students. Brooks created a forum in Fish's San Diego office to enable female attorneys to meet and share their concerns and successes. The forum was implemented in other Fish offices and was the precursor of the firm's EMPOWER initiative.
In addition, Brooks was the driving force behind Fish's creative and flexible reduced hours policy and encouraged Fish to become one of the original 15 firms participating in the OnRamp Fellowship Program that matches experienced female lawyers returning to the legal profession with firms for a one-year paid fellowship. Brooks has done all that and more while raising two children. She is married to attorney Michael Pancer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
- 25th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
- 3Mediators for the Southern District of New York Honored at Eighth Annual James Duane Awards
- 4The Lawyers Picked by Trump for Key Roles in His Second Term
- 5Pa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250