National Women in Law Awards: Marie DiSante
Managing PartnerCarothers DiSante & Freudenberger
December 03, 2018 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
When Marie DiSante, managing partner of California-based Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger, started her legal career in the late 1980s, mentors and leaders in big law firms were mostly men. DiSante made diversity and inclusion a top priority when she started her own firm and vowed she would mentor and create leadership positions for women and minorities within the firm.
Timothy Freudenberger, one of the firm's founding partners, said DiSante takes her role as a mentor to younger attorneys very seriously. “She wants those associates to rise up the ladder and become partners,” Freudenberger said. She has “an incredibly high level” of integrity and ethics, he said. “She's an outstanding role model.”
DiSante, the daughter of an Italian immigrant, grew up in Allentown, Pennsylvania. Although DiSante's father ended his schooling when he was in the seventh grade, she said that education was very important in her family. “That was a big impetus,” DiSante said.
DiSante, one of the first members of her family to go to college, said a couple of her professors at Texas Christian University told her she had what it took to be successful in law school because she wrote well and had good analytical skills. She enrolled in Southern Methodist University School of Law, graduating in 1988.
Her first job after graduating was with Latham & Watkins in Orange County, California. DiSante said Latham had been recruiting on the SMU campus and took an interest in her. She said she was ready to leave Texas and accepted the firm's offer. But Latham began deemphasizing its employment practice, which she preferred, and she was being pushed toward business litigation, DiSante said. After four years with Latham, she moved to the boutique firm of Payne & Fears.
In 1994, DiSante joined a group of attorneys to found Faustman, Carlton, DiSante & Freudenberger. That firm became Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger. “I had great partners when I started out and still do,” DiSante said.
In the beginning, there were four partners and three associates with a vision of becoming a statewide firm. Freudenberger said he and DiSante were in their sixth year as lawyers when they started the firm. The firm today has five offices located in Los Angeles, Orange County, Sacramento, San Diego and San Francisco. Its more than 45 attorneys focus on labor, employment and business immigration employment matters.
Having diversity in leadership at the top has helped with the firm's goal to be diversified, DiSante said. That includes having a female managing partner, and an African-American who is another named partner in the firm.
DiSante has been at the helm of her firm since its inception and her ingrained value of inclusion and goal of further diversifying CDF has resulted in its diverse workforce. Today, the firm reports, more than 60 percent of its attorneys are women and/or minorities. “Organically, we've always had a strong mix of minorities and women and that promotes diversity,” DiSante said.
Fifty percent of CDF nonpartner attorneys are minorities, while 32 percent of all CDF attorneys are minorities, and one-third of its equity partner management committee is minority and female, the firm reports. Freudenberger said DiSante “spearheaded the drive” for flexible work schedules for CDF attorneys. “Marie convinced us of the importance of that,” he said. DiSante said, “We individually talk to people about what they need. We definitely work out different arrangements for people based on what works for them and works for our clients. We're also flexible if people want to work from home some of the time. With modern technology, we can do that.”
Because the firm allows flexible schedules, it has been able to keep many talented attorneys who need time to be with their families, Freudenberger said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250