Lex Mundi Report: How GCs Can Cope in Complex, Uncertain Era
Earlier this year Lex Mundi held a conference with general counsels and chief legal officers to see what worried them, Eric Staal, the vice president of business development at Lex Mundi, explained. “This report is a response to GCs saying they're not sure what to look for,” he said.
December 05, 2018 at 04:42 PM
3 minute read
Lex Mundi, a network of independent law firms, has released a report detailing the best way for legal leaders to handle an era of volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity (VUCA).
Earlier this year Lex Mundi held a conference with general counsels and chief legal officers in Amsterdam to see what worried them, Eric Staal, the vice president of business development at Lex Mundi, explained.
“This report is a response to GCs saying they're not sure what to look for,” Staal explained.
The reason for so many unknowns, Staal said, is that governments across the world are becoming more active in regulating business, and there is a lack of precedent for many emerging technology issues.
“More and more governments have become more and more activist in terms of regulatory enforcement activity,” Staal said in an interview with Corporate Counsel. “There was a feeling that a lot of uncertainty was being driven by technology. Technology is creating a fourth industrial revolution that is changing and transforming business models.”
The report identifies four techniques to help general counsel identify and prepare for those unknowns. They are horizon scanning, scenario planning, embedding learning and information flow, and driving change.
1. Horizon Scanning. Staal said that horizon scanning is an attempt to anticipate what is under the radar. He explained that legal leaders should be looking ahead several years and looking to the policies of governments to see what kind of sanctions a company could face years down the line.
2. Scenario planning. This, he said, is to help people focus on the idea of a “black swan” event, which is a “highly improbable occurrence that has an extreme impact.”
3. Embedding learning and information flow. This, Staal explained, involves breaking down hierarchies and allowing for lower-level employees to feel comfortable to report potential issues to the C-suite. He said cybersecurity breaches are a good example of an instance when a company wants employees to get information to each other.
4. Driving change. Staal said driving change can be difficult but is most important. The best way to do it, he said, is to find a similar situation the company faced and put a dollar amount on the situation.
“The big challenge there is that if you're talking about an anticipated risk under the radar, how do you motivate people to prepare for that change?” Staal asked.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Ordered to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readApple GC’s Compensation Flat Again in 2024, but She Might Snag No. 1 Spot on Top-Paid List Anyway
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250