Keys to Creating a Successful Relationship With Outside Counsel
In 2015 BTI Consulting estimated that 60 percent of legal decision-makers had replaced their primary firms in the prior 18 months and the number-one reason for doing so was that they believed they would get better service elsewhere.
December 11, 2018 at 01:25 PM
5 minute read
In 2015 BTI Consulting estimated that 60 percent of legal decision-makers had replaced their primary firms in the prior 18 months and the number-one reason for doing so was that they believed they would get better service elsewhere. It goes without saying that changing outside counsel is frustrating, time consuming and costly. This article provides four keys to creating a successful relationship with outside counsel so that you can be part of the fortunate 40 percent.
Key Number One: Help outside counsel understand your business. One of the biggest complaints from in-house counsel is that outside counsel does not understand their business. In some ways, it is easy to see how this might happen. Outside counsel is often brought in to address a particular problem or to defend a particular lawsuit. Counsel may mistakenly think that he or she is doing the company a favor and saving fees by staying laser focused only on the issue directly in front of them. But really, this approach often proves shortsighted and may backfire.
Both in-house counsel and outside counsel benefit tremendously when outside counsel learns and understands the client's business, how it generally operates within its larger industry, and the hierarchy within the company. Of course there is some learning curve to this, but there are ways to expedite the process. For example, invite counsel to spend a day on site. There are few things that can replace an actual visit to the client's premises, whether it be a large corporate campus or a working facility. Seeing firsthand the business that the client is engaged in and observing the people working in that business is incredibly meaningful. It not only humanizes the company, it connects outside counsel in a way he or she may not be able to otherwise achieve.
➤➤ Stay on top of in-house developments with Inside Track, a weekly email briefing that breaks down the news, flags key issues and keeps track of who's on the move. Sign up here.
Key Number Two: Make sure that outside counsel understands the role of the legal department in the grand scheme of things. One of the most important things you can do is make sure that outside counsel understands that the legal department of a company is a profit drain, not a profit generator. If you have outside counsel that has never worked inside a corporate legal department, make certain they understand this. This will put outside counsel in a position to help you as you interact with your business people.
Key Number Three: Communicate your expectations. This may seem obvious, but clearly it is not given the statistic cited above. A number of years ago one of the authors of this article was in the audience when a panel of in-house and outside counsel presented on this topic. One of the in-house lawyers commented that she did not like receiving emails from outside counsel over the weekend. She commented that she thought the younger lawyers were trying to impress her with their weekend work, and that the weekend disruptions were unwelcome and annoying. The only thing surprising about the comment was that it was clear she was venting to the audience and had never made this known to outside counsel.
In an ideal world, outside counsel should be asking certain questions at the outset of a relationship, but often this gets overlooked. For example, consider telling outside counsel exactly how you like to receive communications: by email or by phone, or does it depend on the situation? If you like receiving emails, do you have preferences? One of the authors once had a client that liked receiving no more than one email per day unless it was an emergency. You may also want to tell counsel your preferred response time. For nonemergency matters, do you require a response in one day, two days or some other timeframe?
If your work with outside counsel involves reviewing drafts of briefs, advise counsel how far in advance of any deadline you need to receive a draft. If outside counsel has not asked you these questions, tell them your preferences up front. So much of the frustration and miscommunication that develops later in a relationship can be avoided by establishing some relationship parameters in the beginning.
Key Number Four: Make a habit of providing feedback to your outside counsel. Again, it is ideal if outside counsel is soliciting feedback from you. After all, counsel should want to make sure they are doing the best job possible and providing the level of service you expect. That said, if counsel is not doing this, consider being proactive. At the end of a project provide positive feedback and identify any areas of concern or places where there is room for improvement. Another great way to do this is to schedule a meeting at the end of the year to evaluate the work that has been performed, again pointing out positives and places where counsel can improve.
Like any relationship, the relationship between in-house and outside counsel needs to be tended to and developed. If left to its own devices, you may well find yourself in that 60 percent looking for new counsel.
Amy B. Alderfer is a partner at Cozen O'Connor where she focuses her practice in the areas of commercial litigation and products liability.
Melinda Lackey is senior legal counsel at Cell Medica in Houston, Texas. This article was prepared by Melinda Lackey in her personal capacity. The opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not reflect the views of Cell Medica Limited.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1Ex-Starbucks GC Exiting Latest Role, Will Get Severance
- 2Family Law Special Section 2025
- 3We Must Uphold the Rights of Immigrant Students
- 4Orrick Picks Up 13-Lawyer Tech, VC Group From Gunderson Dettmer
- 5How Alzheimer’s and Other Cognitive Diseases Affect Guardianship, POAs and Estate Planning
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250