Atlanta United's GC Revels in Success of Squad Several Years in the Making
The "legally intensive" work behind Atlanta's professional soccer team that won its first league championship in just its second season has been going on since 2013, its general counsel, Mike Egan, said in an interview with Corporate Counsel.
December 14, 2018 at 01:46 PM
4 minute read
On the soccer field, Atlanta United went from expansion startup to Major League Soccer champions in two years. But the behind the scenes, the legal work supporting the team has been going on much longer.
For Mike Egan, senior vice president and general counsel at AMB Group, the work began when he was still a partner at King & Spalding, where he worked closely with The Home Depot's co-founder Arthur Blank for several years before going in-house in January 2015.
AMB Group is the holding company for Blank's for-profit businesses, which include, in addition to Atlanta United, the city's NFL team the Falcons and the Mercedes-Benz Stadium that is home to both professional teams.
In an interview with Corporate Counsel, Egan said that negotiations over the expansion agreement with the MLS began in April 2014, followed by the sometimes contentious series of events related to where the training ground would be located. (The team abandoned a DeKalb County site because of contaminated soil before ending up in the city of Marietta.)
Late 2016 brought the “curveball” that the new stadium would not be ready in time for the start of the season, so Egan said he had to “scramble” to negotiate with Georgia Institute of Technology over the use of its facility.
“Along the way we're also putting agreements with the coaches, and all the sponsorship agreements, in place and watching who the key upfront sponsors of the team would be,” he recalled. “It was a pretty intense five years in terms of legal activity.”
But it was a process, Egan said, that culminated on the night of Dec. 8, when the team won the MLS Cup. He described the days following the championship win as “a blur and a dream all at the same time.”
What the popularity of Atlanta United, not only locally but nationally and globally, “says about Atlanta and its diversity and the passion of the generally youthful fan base is a big plus for the city,” he said. “We had pretty aggressive projections about season ticket sales, but you can't predict passion. We would have to admit that the level of passion and enthusiasm for this team and the sport of soccer surprised even us for sure.”
In the wake of this popularity and success, Egan said there is increased pressure on the trademark front, including the need to police sponsors to ensure they are in compliance with their contracts. Following the championship, Egan said he also worked closely with the Atlanta Police Department and Georgia World Congress Center to facilitate safety and security during the team's victory parade through downtown Atlanta last Monday.
On a day-to-day basis, though, Egan's United-related work may not be too different from other top in-house lawyers. He said he regularly deals with data privacy issues related to players' performance data, trademark matters and agreements with founding partners. He also negotiates local TV and radio agreements.
That area of work, Egan added, is different from his work for the Falcons, since the NFL contracts with the major networks for broadcast rights. Another major difference is that the Falcons players negotiate their contracts directly with the team, while Atlanta United players, who are employed by the MLS, negotiate with the league.
And, when you're talking about championship games and differences between Atlanta United and the Falcons, it's hard not to ask their top lawyer the obvious. Egan responds with a chuckle:
“The endings were very different, but the feelings and the emotions and the way they united the city were very similar.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Uncertainty Hovers Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
A+E Networks CLO Retiring, Capping Storied, 40-Year Career in Entertainment Law
Australian Gambling-Machine Giant Hires Insider as CLO, Relocates Her to Las Vegas
Trending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250