Inviting Independent Contractors to the Holiday Party? Think Through These Risks First
Inviting independent contractors deeply entrenched in the company could bolster a misclassification case.
December 18, 2018 at 02:25 PM
3 minute read
Companies are making their holiday party guest lists—and in-house lawyers should be checking them twice for independent contractors.
Invitations to the holiday party can bolster misclassification cases from contingent workers seeking employee status, lawyers said. That's especially true if the holiday is nominally for employees only, without vendors or other third parties invited.
“The most conservative advice in terms of mitigating joint employment or misclassification risk is to just not invite the non-employees to the holiday party,” said Andrew Moriarty, an employment law partner at Perkins Coie and former senior corporate counsel for labor and employment at Amazon.com Inc. “But that can have negative impacts on morale and inclusion and culture.”
The blow to morale, especially for independent contractors working closely with employees, is a reason many companies choose to take on legal risk and invite contingent workers. Other companies just don't realize that their invite is boosting a possible misclassification suit, said Geoff Mohun, the GC of San Francisco-based workforce management company iWorkGlobal.
Companies that choose to invite contingent workers can take precautions to prevent it becoming a liability. Mohun said independent contractors shouldn't be reimbursed by the company for hotel rooms and other party-related costs as it may for employees. Independent contractors staffing the company could be invited with separate invitations, noting their status as outside workers.
Moriarty and Mohun both said a holiday party invite alone isn't likely to cause a misclassification suit. Independent contractors who don't meet any other misclassification boxes are likely a safe invite.
“The best advice is you don't want to be in a situation where you're so close to the line that you are scared to even talk to your contingent workers,” Moriarty said.
If companies decide that morale risks outweigh legal concerns and put precautions in place, complications can still arise. Independent contractors sexually harassing employees at the holiday party, getting too drunk or fighting could all be traced back to the company.
Mohun said plaintiffs lawyers likely won't accept independent contractor status as an excuse to prevent company liability. Company representatives should step in and stop any inappropriate situations, Moriarty said, despite the “misconception that it's never appropriate for a company employee to tell a contingent worker what to and what not to do.”
It's appropriate for an employee to step in, he said. But the next steps for discipline will be different for a contractor than for an employee.
“If you're dealing with somebody else's employee, you always want to involve that employee's employer. What that means in the moment at the party is nothing, it doesn't mean anything, as the company you should step in and say what you're doing is not appropriate and you need to stop right now,” he said. “What happens next is the employer will partner with the vendor.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh & McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Matt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
- 2The Essential Role of Partnership Agreements in Health Care Private Practices
- 3State Law Falls Short on Disability Rights
- 4People in the News—Nov. 26, 2024—Barley Snyder, McNees
- 5Akin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250